मायामोह-प्रवर्तन, वेदमार्ग-बहिष्कार, तथा पाषण्ड-संसर्ग-दोषः
Māyāmoha’s Delusion, Rejection of the Vedic Path, and the Fault of Heretical Association
देवतापितृभूतानि तथानभ्यर्च्य यो ऽतिथीन् भुङ्क्ते स पातकं भुङ्क्ते निष्कृतिस् तस्य कीदृशी
devatāpitṛbhūtāni tathānabhyarcya yo 'tithīn bhuṅkte sa pātakaṃ bhuṅkte niṣkṛtis tasya kīdṛśī
Whoever eats without first offering due reverence to the devas, the ancestors, and living beings—and without honoring the guest—does not truly eat food; he consumes sin. What atonement could ever be adequate for such a fault?
Sage Parāśara (teaching Maitreya)
Speaker: Parasara
Topic: Sin incurred by eating without offerings to devas/pitṛs/bhūtas and without honoring atithi; gravity and atonement
Teaching: Ethical
Quality: severe, admonitory
Concept: Food becomes sanctified only when preceded by honoring devas, pitṛs, beings, and guests; otherwise consumption turns into pātaka, demanding grave expiation.
Vedantic Theme: Dharma
Application: Before eating, offer a simple prayer/naivedya, remember ancestors, share with others (people/animals), and treat guests with dignity.
Vishishtadvaita: Eating is integrated into īśvara-sevā: the world and its beings are Bhagavān’s śeṣa (dependents), so offering and sharing express the soul’s śeṣatva (servitude).
Vishnu Form: Hari
Bhakti Type: Dasya
This verse frames eating as a sacred act that must be integrated into dharma: offerings and hospitality acknowledge the cosmic and social web upheld by Vishnu’s order; without them, the act becomes a generator of pāpa.
Parāśara states that one who eats without honoring the atithi is effectively ‘eating sin’; the rhetorical question about expiation underscores the gravity of violating household dharma.
Even when Vishnu is not named, the ethic reflects Vaishnava cosmology: dharma and rightful conduct are expressions of the Supreme Sustainer’s governance, and household rites align daily life with that sustaining Reality.