HomeMatsya PuranaAdh. 47Shloka 62
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 62

Matsya Purana — Yadu Lineage

यज्ञे देवानथ गतं दितिजाः काव्यमाह्वयन् किं त्वं नो मिषतां राज्यं त्यक्त्वा यज्ञं पुनर्गतः //

yajñe devānatha gataṃ ditijāḥ kāvyamāhvayan kiṃ tvaṃ no miṣatāṃ rājyaṃ tyaktvā yajñaṃ punargataḥ //

When the gods had gone to the yajña (sacrifice), the Daityas invoked Kāvya (Śukrācārya): “How is it that, while we looked on, you abandoned the kingdom and have returned again to the sacrifice?”

yajñein the sacrifice
yajñe:
devānthe gods
devān:
athathen/thereupon
atha:
gatamhaving gone
gatam:
ditijāḥthe sons of Diti (Daityas/demons)
ditijāḥ:
kāvyamKāvya (Śukra, the preceptor of the Asuras)
kāvyam:
āhvayancalled/invoked
āhvayan:
kimhow?/why?
kim:
tvamyou
tvam:
naḥour/us
naḥ:
miṣatāmwhile (we) were watching/looking on
miṣatām:
rājyamkingdom/sovereignty
rājyam:
tyaktvāhaving abandoned
tyaktvā:
yajñamthe sacrifice
yajñam:
punaḥagain
punaḥ:
gataḥ(you) went/returned
gataḥ:
Daityas (Ditijas), addressing Kāvya (Śukrācārya)
DevasDaityas (Ditijas)Kāvya (Śukrācārya)Yajña
YajñaDeva-Asura conflictRoyal authorityPriestly counselDharma

FAQs

This verse does not address pralaya directly; it highlights inter-group conflict around a yajña, showing how cosmic order is defended through ritual even amid political contest.

It frames a tension between rājya (sovereignty) and yajña (ritual obligation): abandoning kingship for sacrifice (or returning to sacrifice after leaving rule) is treated as a consequential choice that invites scrutiny, underscoring that duty must be consistent and publicly accountable.

The ritual significance is central: the yajña is portrayed as a pivotal arena where divine order and political legitimacy are negotiated, and where rival parties seek advantage by invoking authoritative priestly guidance (Kāvya/Śukra).