Matsya Purana — The Origin of Yajña in Tretā Yuga and the Debate on Animal Sacrifice vs. Non-...
वर्णाश्रमप्रतिष्ठानं कृत्वा मन्त्रैश्च तैः पुनः संहितास्तु सुसंहृत्य कथं यज्ञः प्रवर्तितः एतच्छ्रुत्वाब्रवीत्सूतः श्रूयतां तत्प्रचोदितम् //
varṇāśramapratiṣṭhānaṃ kṛtvā mantraiśca taiḥ punaḥ saṃhitāstu susaṃhṛtya kathaṃ yajñaḥ pravartitaḥ etacchrutvābravītsūtaḥ śrūyatāṃ tatpracoditam //
After establishing the proper order of the varṇas and āśramas, and again applying those mantras, and having carefully compiled and arranged the Saṃhitās—how, then, was the sacrifice (yajña) set in motion? Hearing this, Sūta said: “Listen to what is prompted by that inquiry.”
This verse does not describe pralaya directly; it focuses on restoring order after disruption by establishing varṇāśrama, organizing sacred recensions (Saṃhitās), and restarting yajña—an implied theme of re-stabilizing dharma after a period of disorder.
It frames yajña as dependent on social-religious order (varṇāśrama) and correct mantra/textual transmission (Saṃhitās). For rulers and householders, it implies supporting dharma through proper institutions, patronage of priests, and correct performance of rites rather than improvised ritual.
The significance is ritual: yajña is ‘set in motion’ only after (1) varṇāśrama is established, (2) mantras are properly applied, and (3) Saṃhitās are carefully compiled—highlighting textual/ritual correctness as the prerequisite for valid sacrifice.