HomeMatsya PuranaAdh. 143Shloka 21
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 21

Matsya Purana — The Origin of Yajña in Tretā Yuga and the Debate on Animal Sacrifice vs. Non-...

हिंसा स्वभावो यज्ञस्य इति मे दर्शनागमः तथैते भाविता मन्त्रा हिंसालिङ्गा महर्षिभिः //

hiṃsā svabhāvo yajñasya iti me darśanāgamaḥ tathaite bhāvitā mantrā hiṃsāliṅgā maharṣibhiḥ //

“Violence is intrinsic to sacrifice”—such is the doctrine I have received through my tradition of teaching. Accordingly, the great sages have also formulated these mantras so that they bear the mark (indication) of violence.

hiṃsāviolence, injury (ritual killing)
hiṃsā:
svabhāvaḥinherent nature, intrinsic character
svabhāvaḥ:
yajñasyaof the sacrifice (yajña)
yajñasya:
itithus
iti:
meto me / my
me:
darśana-āgamaḥreceived doctrine, traditional teaching of a philosophical school
darśana-āgamaḥ:
tathālikewise, accordingly
tathā:
etethese
ete:
bhāvitāḥcomposed, formulated, cultivated (with intended force)
bhāvitāḥ:
mantrāḥmantras, sacrificial formulae
mantrāḥ:
hiṃsā-liṅgāḥhaving violence as their sign/indicator, marked by himsa
hiṃsā-liṅgāḥ:
maharṣibhiḥby the great seers.
maharṣibhiḥ:
Likely Vaivasvata Manu (in dialogue context, presenting a received doctrinal view about yajña)
MaharishisYajñaMantrasHimsa
YajnaDharmaRitualHimsaVedic tradition

FAQs

This verse does not discuss pralaya directly; it focuses on ritual theory, asserting that himsa is considered an intrinsic feature of certain yajñas according to a received doctrinal tradition.

It frames a key dharmic tension relevant to householders and rulers who sponsor public rites: some sacrificial acts are defended as scripturally sanctioned even when they involve harm, and the verse grounds that claim in tradition (āgama) and sage-authored mantras.

Ritually, it highlights that mantras themselves are crafted to signal the sacrificial act’s nature—implying that correct yajña performance depends on understanding the mantra’s intent, including whether the rite entails sanctioned himsa.