Shloka 45

Matsya Purana — Hiranyakashipu’s Boons

Devanagari script

नानारूपैरुपकृतां विचित्रैरतिभास्वरैः स्तम्भैर्न विभृता सा वै शाश्वती चाक्षपा सदा //

Transliteration

nānārūpairupakṛtāṃ vicitrairatibhāsvaraiḥ stambhairna vibhṛtā sā vai śāśvatī cākṣapā sadā //

Translation

That (structure) is not to be supported by pillars that are made in many different forms—variegated and overly dazzling; for such showy supports do not accord with what is enduring, and they constantly disturb the eye.

Word by Word

• नानारूपैः: with many forms/varied designs

• उपकृताम्: fashioned/constructed/embellished

• विचित्रैः: variegated, ornate

• अतिभास्वरैः: excessively brilliant/flashy

• स्तम्भैः: by pillars/columns

• न: not

• विभृता: supported/borne

• सा: that (edifice/structure)

• वै: indeed

• शाश्वती: lasting/enduring, timeless

• च: and

• अक्षपा: eye-disturbing/harsh to the sight (lit. 'injuring the eyes')

• सदा: always.

Speaker

• Lord Matsya (in instruction to Vaivasvata Manu, Vastuvidya context)

Entities Mentioned

• Matsya
• Manu
• Stambha (pillar)
• Vastuvidya

Tags

• Vastu Shastra
• Temple Architecture
• Pillars
• Aesthetics
• Design Rules

FAQs

What does this verse reveal about the creation or dissolution (Pralaya)?

This verse is not about Pralaya; it belongs to Vastuvidya and teaches that excessive ornamentation in structural elements (pillars) is discouraged in enduring sacred/architectural design.

How does this verse relate to the duties of a King or Householder?

It advises patrons (kings/householders) commissioning buildings or temples to prefer stable, harmonious, and restrained design over flashy display—supporting dharmic stewardship of resources and public aesthetics.

What is the architectural or ritual significance mentioned here?

Architecturally, it cautions against using overly ornate, visually harsh pillars for supporting a lasting structure, emphasizing durability and visual harmony as Vastu-aligned principles.