Shloka 119
Puṣkara-Śapatha Itihāsa (Agastya–Indra Dispute at the Tīrthas) | पुष्कर-शपथ-आख्यानम्
उपाध्यायमध: कृत्वा ऋचो<ध्येतु अजूंषि च । जुहोतु च स कक्षाग्नौ बिसस्तैन्यं करोति यः:,जो मृणालकी चोरी करता हो, उसे उपाध्याय (अध्यापक या गुरु) को नीचे बैठाकर उनसे ऋग्वेद और यजुर्वेदका अध्ययन करने और घास-फ़ूसकी आगमें आहुति डालनेका पाप लगे
upādhyāyam adhaḥ kṛtvā ṛco 'dhyetuṃ yajūṃṣi ca | juhotu ca sa kakṣāgnau bisastainyaṃ karoti yaḥ ||
Bharadvāja said: “He who commits the theft of bisas (lotus-stalk fibres) incurs the same sin as one who, after making his teacher sit in a lower place, studies the Ṛgveda and the Yajurveda in a disrespectful manner and offers oblations into a mere grass-fire. The teaching is that even seemingly minor theft is a serious breach of dharma, and that sacred learning and ritual, when performed with contempt for the teacher and proper rite, become acts of wrongdoing rather than merit.”
भरद्वाज उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse equates the theft of something seemingly small (lotus-stalk fibres) with grave religious misconduct: disrespecting one’s teacher while undertaking Vedic study and performing a degraded form of ritual. It teaches that dharma depends on intention, reverence, and right conduct—not merely on the external act.
Bharadvāja is enumerating and grading moral faults. He states that a person who steals bisas bears a sin comparable to someone who humiliates the upādhyāya, studies the Vedas in that disrespectful posture, and offers oblations into an improper ‘grass-fire,’ thereby turning sacred acts into wrongdoing.