HomeChanakya NitiCh. 16Shloka 15
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 15

Virtue and Vice — Chanakya Niti

क्षीयन्ते सर्वदानानि यज्ञहोमबलिक्रियाः ।

न क्षीयते पात्रदानमभयं सर्वदेहिनाम् ॥

kṣīyante sarvadānāni yajñahomabalikriyāḥ |

na kṣīyate pātradānam abhayaṃ sarvadehinām ||

All gifts, and rites such as sacrifice, oblation, and offerings, are liable to be exhausted; but giving to the worthy and granting fearlessness to all embodied beings are said not to diminish.

क्षीयन्तेperish/are exhausted
क्षीयन्ते:
TypeVerb
Rootक्षि
Formलट्, प्रथमपुरुष, बहुवचन (आत्मनेपद)
सर्वदानानिall gifts/charities
सर्वदानानि:
TypeNoun
Rootसर्वदान
Formनपुंसकलिङ्ग, प्रथमा, बहुवचन
यज्ञहोमबलिक्रियाःsacrifices, oblations, and bali-rites
यज्ञहोमबलिक्रियाः:
TypeNoun
Rootयज्ञहोमबलिक्रिया
Formस्त्रीलिङ्ग, प्रथमा, बहुवचन
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
Formअव्यय
क्षीयतेperishes/is exhausted
क्षीयते:
TypeVerb
Rootक्षि
Formलट्, प्रथमपुरुष, एकवचन (आत्मनेपद)
पात्रदानम्giving to a worthy recipient
पात्रदानम्:
TypeNoun
Rootपात्रदान
Formनपुंसकलिङ्ग, प्रथमा, एकवचन
अभयम्fearlessness/safety
अभयम्:
TypeNoun
Rootअभय
Formनपुंसकलिङ्ग, प्रथमा, एकवचन
सर्वदेहिनाम्of all embodied beings
सर्वदेहिनाम्:
TypeNoun
Rootसर्वदेहिन्
Formपुंलिङ्ग, षष्ठी, बहुवचन
Chanakya (Kautilya)
अनुष्टुप्
Ancient EthicsNīti LiteratureSanskrit PhilologyHistory of Political Thought
Dāna (gift/charity)Yajña (sacrifice)Homa (fire oblation)Bali (offering)Pātra (worthy recipient)Abhaya (fearlessness)Sarvadehin (all embodied beings)

FAQs

In the broader nītiśāstra tradition, this verse reflects a period in which ritual practices (yajña, homa, bali) and charitable giving (dāna) were discussed alongside social ethics. The contrast between consumable ritual expenditure and enduring ethical acts can be read as part of a long-standing discourse on how resources, merit, and social order were conceptualized in classical Indian intellectual history.

The verse uses 'pātradāna' to denote giving directed toward a 'pātra'—a recipient framed as worthy or fit. In historical usage, 'pātra' often implies suitability based on recognized criteria (learning, conduct, need, or social role), indicating that the tradition distinguished between undifferentiated giving and giving understood as properly placed within a moral-evaluative framework.

The repeated verb-root 'kṣī' (to diminish, be exhausted) establishes a semantic opposition: materially bounded acts (gifts and ritual expenditures) are described as 'kṣīyante,' while 'pātradāna' and 'abhaya' are framed as 'na kṣīyate.' This contrast functions rhetorically to elevate certain ethical categories—especially 'abhaya' (security from fear)—as conceptually non-depleting, suggesting an ideal of moral value not measured by finite material consumption.