HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 2Shloka 44
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Sankhya Yoga, Shloka 44

Sankhya Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 44 illustration

भोगैश्वर्यप्रसक्तानां तयापहृतचेतसाम् । व्यवसायात्मिका बुद्धिः समाधौ न विधीयते ॥ २.४४ ॥

bhogaiśvarya-prasaktānāṁ tayāpahṛta-cetasām | vyavasāyātmikā buddhiḥ samādhau na vidhīyate || 2.44 ||

For those attached to enjoyment and power, whose minds are carried away by that (flowery speech), the steadfast, single-pointed intellect is not established in samādhi.

For those attached to enjoyment and power, whose minds are carried away by that (flowery speech), the resolute intellect does not arise in samādhi.

For those clinging to enjoyment and lordship, whose consciousness is stolen away by that, one-pointed resolute understanding is not established in samādhi.

samādhi here can mean meditative integration/collectedness rather than a technical later-yoga absorption alone. The verse links attachment (prasakti) to attentional capture (apahṛta-cetas), obstructing stable resolve (vyavasāyātmikā buddhi).

भोगin/with enjoyments (sense-pleasures)
भोग:
Rootभोग
ऐश्वर्यin/with lordship, wealth, power
ऐश्वर्य:
Rootऐश्वर्य
प्रसक्तानाम्of those who are attached
प्रसक्तानाम्:
Rootप्रसक्त
तयाby that (attachment/that state)
तया:
Karana
Rootतद्
अपहृतcarried away, stolen away
अपहृत:
Rootअप-√हृ
चेतसाम्of (their) minds
चेतसाम्:
Rootचेतस्
व्यवसायात्मिकाsingle-pointed in resolve; of the nature of determined purpose
व्यवसायात्मिका:
Rootव्यवसायात्मिक
बुद्धिःintellect, understanding
बुद्धिः:
Karta
Rootबुद्धि
समाधौin samādhi, in deep concentration
समाधौ:
Adhikarana
Rootसमाधि
not
:
Root
विधीयतेis established/ordained; comes to be fixed
विधीयते:
Root√धा (वि+धा)
Krishna
Bhoga (enjoyment)Aiśvarya (power/prosperity)Samādhi (collectedness)Vyavasāya (resolve)
Attachment as distractionConditions for concentrationCritique of reward fixation

FAQs

It describes attentional hijacking: strong attachment to rewards scatters the mind, making sustained focus and clear commitment difficult.

It implies that inner integration (samādhi) is incompatible with a consciousness dominated by craving for enjoyment and status, which perpetuates karmic entanglement.

This concludes the critique of reward-centered religiosity and reinforces why buddhi-yoga requires a shift from external incentives to inner steadiness.

It can be applied to consumerism and status anxiety: reducing compulsive reward-seeking can support mental clarity, ethical steadiness, and contemplative practice.