HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 2Shloka 31
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Sankhya Yoga, Shloka 31

Sankhya Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 31 illustration

स्वधर्ममपि चावेक्ष्य न विकम्पितुमर्हसि । धर्म्याद्धि युद्धाच्छ्रेयोऽन्यत्क्षत्रियस्य न विद्यते ॥ २.३१ ॥

svadharmam api cāvekṣya na vikampitum arhasi | dharmyād dhi yuddhāc chreyo ’nyat kṣatriyasya na vidyate || 2.31 ||

Moreover, considering your own svadharma, you should not waver; for a kṣatriya there is nothing higher than a righteous battle.

Considering your own duty, you should not waver; for a warrior, there is nothing better than a righteous struggle.

Even looking to your own duty, you should not tremble; for a kṣatriya there is no higher good than a duty-aligned conflict (i.e., a just contest).

Translations differ in rendering yuddha: some retain “battle,” while others emphasize “duty-aligned struggle.” In academic framing, the verse is read within the epic’s social-ethical context (varṇa-dharma) and can also be interpreted as an inner moral struggle.

स्वधर्मम्one's own duty (svadharma)
स्वधर्मम्:
कर्म
Rootस्वधर्म
अपिalso / even
अपि:
Rootअपि
and
:
Root
आवेक्ष्यhaving considered / looking at
आवेक्ष्य:
Root√ईक्ष् (ईक्षते) उपसर्गः आ-
not
:
Root
विकम्पितुम्to tremble / to waver
विकम्पितुम्:
Root√कम्प् (कम्पते) उपसर्गः वि-
अर्हसिyou ought / you are fit
अर्हसि:
Root√अर्ह् (अर्हति)
धर्म्यात्from what is righteous / from a duty-sanctioned
धर्म्यात्:
अपादान
Rootधर्म्य
हिindeed / for
हि:
Rootहि
युद्धात्from battle / from war
युद्धात्:
अपादान
Rootयुद्ध
श्रेयःthe better / the highest good
श्रेयः:
कर्म
Rootश्रेयस्
अन्यत्other (anything else)
अन्यत्:
कर्म
Rootअन्य
क्षत्रियस्यof a Kshatriya
क्षत्रियस्य:
Rootक्षत्रिय
not
:
Root
विद्यतेexists / is found
विद्यते:
Root√विद् (विद्यते)
KrishnaArjuna
Svadharma (one’s own duty)DharmaVarṇa-āśrama (social order, background concept)
Role-ethicsMoral courageDuty over hesitation

FAQs

It addresses indecision and anxiety by recommending alignment with a clear value-framework (one’s duty), which can reduce inner conflict.

Metaphysics is not primary here; the focus shifts from ontology of the self to ethical action consistent with dharma.

In the narrative setting of a civil conflict, Krishna reframes Arjuna’s crisis as a test of vocational and moral responsibility rather than personal aversion.

It can be applied as guidance to act according to principled responsibility (professional ethics, civic duty) especially when emotionally difficult.