HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 2Shloka 12
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Sankhya Yoga, Shloka 12

Sankhya Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 12 illustration

न त्वेवाहं जातु नासं न त्वं नेमे जनाधिपाः । न चैव न भविष्यामः सर्वे वयमतः परम् ॥ २.१२ ॥

na tv evāhaṃ jātu nāsaṃ na tvaṃ neme janādhipāḥ | na caiva na bhaviṣyāmaḥ sarve vayam ataḥ param || 2.12 ||

Never indeed was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor these rulers of men; and never shall we all cease to exist hereafter.

Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor these kings; nor shall any of us cease to exist in the future.

‘It is not the case that I did not exist at any time, nor you, nor these rulers of people; nor is it the case that all of us shall not exist hereafter.’

This is a strong continuity claim. Some traditions read it as personal immortality; many academic interpretations treat it as asserting the persistence of the self (ātman) across temporal change, without specifying later doctrinal details such as reincarnation in this verse alone.

not
:
Root
तुbut
तु:
Rootतु
एवindeed
एव:
Rootएव
अहम्I
अहम्:
Karta
Rootअस्मद्
जातुever (at any time)
जातु:
Rootजातु
not
:
Root
आसम्was
आसम्:
Root√अस् (भू-सत्तायाम्)
not
:
Root
त्वम्you
त्वम्:
Karta
Rootयुष्मद्
not
:
Root
इमेthese
इमे:
Karta
Rootइदम्
जनाधिपाःkings (lords of people)
जनाधिपाः:
Karta
Rootजनाधिप
not
:
Root
and
:
Root
एवindeed
एव:
Rootएव
not
:
Root
भविष्यामःshall be
भविष्यामः:
Root√भू (सत्तायाम्)
सर्वेall
सर्वे:
Karta
Rootसर्व
वयम्we
वयम्:
Karta
Rootअस्मद्
अतःthereafter / henceforth
अतः:
Rootअतः
परम्after (that) / beyond
परम्:
Rootपर
Krishna
ĀtmanNityatva (permanence)Time and identity
Continuity of existenceReframing life and deathMetaphysical reassurance

FAQs

It aims to reduce existential panic by placing the crisis within a larger continuity, offering a cognitive frame that can stabilize emotion.

Krishna asserts the non-cessation of the self across past and future, a foundational claim for later discussions of embodiment, rebirth, and liberation.

Following the critique of misplaced grief (2.11), this verse supplies the first explicit metaphysical premise supporting equanimity.

Even without adopting metaphysical commitments, readers may take it as an invitation to view identity as more than momentary roles, enabling calmer ethical deliberation.