HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 18Shloka 75
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Moksha Sannyasa Yoga, Shloka 75

Moksha Sannyasa Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 75 illustration

व्यासप्रसादाच्छ्रुतवानेतद्गुह्यमहं परम् । योगं योगेश्वरात्कृष्णात्साक्षात्कथयतः स्वयम् ॥ १८.७५ ॥

vyāsa-prasādāc chrutavān etad guhyam ahaṁ param | yogaṁ yogeśvarāt kṛṣṇāt sākṣāt kathayataḥ svayam || 18.75 ||

By the grace of Vyāsa I heard this supreme secret—this Yoga—directly from Kṛṣṇa, the Lord of Yoga, as He Himself spoke it.

व्यासजी की कृपा से मैंने यह परम गुह्य योग योगेश्वर कृष्ण से स्वयं प्रत्यक्ष कहते हुए सुना।

By Vyāsa’s favor I heard this supreme secret—this yoga—from Kṛṣṇa, the lord of yoga, himself speaking directly.

This verse foregrounds mediation and authority: Sañjaya’s ‘hearing’ is enabled by Vyāsa. Interpretations vary between a supernatural grant and a literary claim of inspired transmission.

व्यासof Vyāsa
व्यास:
Rootव्यास
प्रसादात्from (the) grace
प्रसादात्:
Apadana
Rootप्रसाद
श्रुतवान्(I) have heard
श्रुतवान्:
Karta
Rootश्रु (√श्रु)
एतत्this
एतत्:
Karma
Rootएतद्
गुह्यम्secret (teaching)
गुह्यम्:
Karma
Rootगुह्य
अहम्I
अहम्:
Karta
Rootअस्मद्
परम्supreme, highest
परम्:
Karma
Rootपर
योगम्yoga (the discipline/union)
योगम्:
Karma
Rootयोग
योगेश्वरात्from the Lord of Yoga
योगेश्वरात्:
Apadana
Rootयोगेश्वर
कृष्णात्from Kṛṣṇa
कृष्णात्:
Apadana
Rootकृष्ण
साक्षात्directly, before (my) eyes
साक्षात्:
Rootसाक्षात्
कथयतःof (him) who was speaking
कथयतः:
Rootकथय (√कथ् + णिच्)
स्वयम्himself
स्वयम्:
Rootस्वयम्
Sanjaya
Paramaguhya (supreme secret)YogaPrasāda (favor/enablement)
Textual authority and lineageInspired transmissionKrishna as teacher

FAQs

The verse emphasizes trusted mediation: people often accept complex teachings when conveyed through credible lineages and reliable communicators.

It presents the teaching as ‘guhya’ (esoteric) and ‘parama’ (supreme), suggesting a salvific knowledge accessible through proper transmission.

It explains how Sañjaya could report the private dialogue, reinforcing the epic’s narrative plausibility within its own worldview.

When interpreting traditions, distinguish doctrinal claims about revelation/lineage from historical-critical questions about composition and redaction.