HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 18Shloka 30
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Moksha Sannyasa Yoga, Shloka 30

Moksha Sannyasa Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 30 illustration

प्रवृत्तिं च निवृत्तिं च कार्याकार्ये भयाभये । बन्धं मोक्षं च या वेत्ति बुद्धिः सा पार्थ सात्त्विकी ॥ १८.३० ॥

pravṛttiṃ ca nivṛttiṃ ca kāryākārye bhayābhaye | bandhaṃ mokṣaṃ ca yā vetti buddhiḥ sā pārtha sāttvikī || 18.30 ||

That intellect is sattvic, O Pārtha, which knows rightly activity and withdrawal, what ought to be done and what ought not, fear and fearlessness, bondage and liberation.

That intellect is sattvic, O Pārtha, which knows activity and withdrawal, what ought to be done and what ought not, fear and fearlessness, bondage and liberation.

Sattvic is that intellect, O Pārtha, which discerns engagement and disengagement, the to-be-done and the not-to-be-done, the fearful and the non-fearful, and bondage and release.

pravṛtti/nivṛtti can be read as (1) worldly engagement vs renunciant withdrawal, or (2) initiating vs restraining impulses. “Fear/fearlessness” is often interpreted ethically (appropriate caution vs clarity) rather than as mere emotion.

प्रवृत्तिम्activity; engagement (in action)
प्रवृत्तिम्:
Karma
Rootप्रवृत्ति (प्र-√वृत्)
and
:
Root
निवृत्तिम्withdrawal; cessation (from action)
निवृत्तिम्:
Karma
Rootनिवृत्ति (नि-√वृत्)
and
:
Root
कार्याकार्येwhat ought to be done and what ought not to be done
कार्याकार्ये:
Karma
Rootकार्य + अकार्य
भयाभयेfear and fearlessness
भयाभये:
Karma
Rootभय + अभय
बन्धम्bondage
बन्धम्:
Karma
Rootबन्ध
मोक्षम्liberation
मोक्षम्:
Karma
Rootमोक्ष
and
:
Root
याwhich (that)
या:
Rootयद्
वेत्तिknows; understands
वेत्ति:
Root√विद् (विद् ज्ञाने)
बुद्धिःintellect; discriminative understanding
बुद्धिः:
Karta
Rootबुद्धि
साthat
सा:
Rootतद्
पार्थO Pārtha (son of Pṛthā)
पार्थ:
Rootपार्थ
सात्त्विकीsāttvic; belonging to sattva
सात्त्विकी:
Rootसात्त्विकी
KrishnaArjuna
Buddhi (discernment)Dharma (normative action)MokṣaGuṇas
Ethical discriminationClarity about liberationAppropriate engagement and restraint

FAQs

Sattvic cognition is portrayed as integrative discernment: it distinguishes healthy engagement from restraint, recognizes appropriate vs inappropriate tasks, and differentiates paralyzing fear from clear-sighted caution.

The verse links clarity of intellect to liberation: understanding what binds (bandha) versus what frees (mokṣa) is a cognitive prerequisite for spiritual release in the Gītā’s framework.

In the chapter’s three-guṇa analysis, this defines the “best” form of buddhi as one aligned with dharma and oriented toward mokṣa, setting up contrasts with rajasic and tamasic intellect.

It supports decision-making practices that separate impulse from considered action: clarifying goals, assessing consequences, and identifying which choices reinforce compulsive patterns versus foster autonomy.