HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 18Shloka 11
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Moksha Sannyasa Yoga, Shloka 11

Moksha Sannyasa Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 11 illustration

न हि देहभृता शक्यं त्यक्तुं कर्माण्यशेषतः । यस्तु कर्मफलत्यागी स त्यागीत्यभिधीयते ॥ १८.११ ॥

na hi deha-bhṛtā śakyaṃ tyaktuṃ karmāṇy aśeṣataḥ | yas tu karma-phala-tyāgī sa tyāgīty abhidhīyate || 18.11 ||

For the embodied being it is not possible to abandon actions entirely; but he who renounces the fruit of action is called a renouncer.

देहधारी मनुष्य के लिए समस्त कर्मों का पूर्णतः त्याग करना संभव नहीं है; जो कर्मफल का त्याग करता है, वही त्यागी कहा जाता है।

For one who bears a body, it is not possible to abandon actions entirely; rather, the one who relinquishes the fruits of action is called a renouncer.

Traditional expositions often use this to reconcile household life with spiritual practice: ‘renunciation’ is redefined as inner relinquishment. Academic renderings emphasize practical anthropology: embodied life entails activity.

not
:
Root
हिindeed; for
हि:
Rootहि
देहभृताby/for one who bears a body (an embodied being)
देहभृता:
Karta
Rootदेहभृत्
शक्यम्possible
शक्यम्:
Rootशक्य
त्यक्तुम्to abandon
त्यक्तुम्:
Root√त्यज्
कर्माणिactions
कर्माणि:
Karma
Rootकर्मन्
अशेषतःentirely; without remainder
अशेषतः:
Rootअशेषतस्
यःwho
यः:
Karta
Rootयद्
तुbut
तु:
Rootतु
कर्मफलत्यागीone who renounces the fruit of action
कर्मफलत्यागी:
Karta
Rootकर्मफलत्यागिन्
सःhe
सः:
Karta
Rootतद्
त्यागीa renouncer
त्यागी:
Karta
Rootत्यागिन्
इतिthus
इति:
Rootइति
अभिधीयतेis called; is designated
अभिधीयते:
Root√अभि-धा
KrishnaArjuna
Embodiment (deha-bhṛt)KarmaKarma-phala-tyāgaPractical ethics
Impossibility of total inactivityRedefinition of renunciationIntegration of action and liberation

FAQs

It reframes spiritual discipline away from suppression of activity toward changing one’s relationship to outcomes—reducing compulsive reward-seeking.

Action belongs to embodied existence and the guṇas; liberation-oriented practice targets attachment to results, which is a key mechanism of karmic continuity.

This verse supports the chapter’s broader argument that renunciation is primarily internal (tyāga of fruit/attachment), not mere external withdrawal.

In ordinary life, one cannot avoid acting; the practical discipline is to work responsibly while loosening fixation on promotion, applause, or control.