Śreyas and Paramārtha: The Ribhu–Nidāgha Teaching on Non-Dual Self
Advaita
विज्ञानं परमार्थोऽसौ वेत्ति नोऽतथ्यदर्शनः । वेणुरंघ्रविभेदेन भेदः षङ्जादिसंज्ञितः ॥ ३२ ॥
vijñānaṃ paramārtho'sau vetti no'tathyadarśanaḥ | veṇuraṃghravibhedena bhedaḥ ṣaṅjādisaṃjñitaḥ || 32 ||
جو وِجنان اور اُس پرمار্থ کو جانتا ہے وہی تَتْوَدَرشی ہے؛ باطل نظر والا نہیں جانتا۔ جیسے بانسری میں انگلیوں کے سوراخوں کے فرق سے شڈج وغیرہ سُر کے بھید ناموں سے معروف ہوتے ہیں۔
Sanatkumara (teaching Narada in a Moksha-Dharma discourse; using a technical analogy from musical science)
Vrata: none
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: adbhuta
It teaches viveka: the realized knower apprehends paramārtha (ultimate truth), while the deluded remain in atathya-darśana (false seeing). The flute-note analogy shows how apparent differences arise from conditions, not from the essence.
By implying that devotion should be grounded in right vision: when perception is purified, the seeker recognizes the One Reality behind changing names and forms—supporting steady Vishnu-bhakti rather than devotion based on confusion or mere externals.
It gestures toward Śikṣā (phonetics/sound discipline) and nāda-based understanding: like notes (ṣaḍja etc.) arising from precise finger/air positions, spiritual insight also depends on correct method and discernment.