Varaha Purana 201.16: Adhyaya 201, Shloka 16
The Battle between the Rākṣasas and Yama’s Attendant-Messengers
एते वधार्थं निर्दिष्टास्त्वयैव च महात्मना ॥ न युक्तं विविधाकाराः ह्यस्माकं नाशनाय वै ॥
ete vadhārthaṃ nirdiṣṭās tvayaiva ca mahātmanā || na yuktaṃ vividhākārā hy asmākaṃ nāśanāya vai ||
“Ang mga ito ay itinakda mo mismo, O dakilang-loob, upang pumatay. Hindi nararapat na ang mga nilalang na sari-saring anyo ay italaga sa aming pagkapuksa.”
Rākṣasas
Varaha Avatara Context: {"is_varaha_focus":false}
Bhu Devi Dialogue: {"is_dialogue":true,"speaker_role":"observer","key_question":"Why is it proper that you (the great-souled authority) appoint diverse beings specifically for our destruction?"}
Mathura Mandala: {"is_mathura_related":false}
Dharma Shastra: {"has_dharma_rule":false}
Vrata Mahatmya: {"has_vrata":false}
Cosmic Boar Symbolism: {"has_symbolism":false}
Philosophical Teaching: {"has_teaching":true,"teaching_type":"theodicy / moral protest within cosmic order","core_concept":"Agents of destruction appeal to a higher allocator of roles, questioning the justice of being ‘designated’ for slaughter.","practical_application":"When facing conflict, examine whether one is projecting blame onto ‘fate’/authority; seek clarity on responsibility before action."}
Subject Matter: ["Ethics","Conflict","Narrative Theology (neutral archival framing)"]
Primary Rasa: raudra
Secondary Rasa: bibhatsa
Related Themes: Varaha Purana 201.18-19 (continuation of the rakshasa appeal to dharma and promise)
Visual Art Cues: {"scene_description":"A group of Rākṣasas, tense and defiant, address a majestic unseen authority, gesturing as if indicting a cosmic decree that marks them for slaughter.","item_prompts":["cluster of rakshasas with varied faces/forms","raised hands in protest","dark battlefield haze","implied divine listener (off-frame throne or aura)"],"kerala_mural_prompt":"Kerala mural style, rakshasas with bold facial patterns and dramatic eyes, warm earthy palette, stylized hand-gestures (mudrā) of protest, divine aura suggested at edge.","tanjore_prompt":"Tanjore style, rakshasa court/battle tableau with embossed ornaments, gold-leaf halo indicating the addressed ‘mahātmā’, rich reds and greens.","mysore_prompt":"Mysore painting style, fine linework on rakshasa expressions, restrained gold detailing, narrative moment of accusation and appeal.","pahari_prompt":"Pahari style, angular hillside-like composition even in battle setting, expressive faces, minimal background, emphasis on dialogue gesture."}
Audio Atmosphere: {"recitation_mood":"tense, argumentative","suggested_raga":"Bhairavi","pace":"medium","voice_tone":"firm, edged with grievance"}
FAQs
It illustrates a common epic-Purāṇic motif: antagonistic figures articulate a reasoned objection, preserving rhetorical forms of petition and protest within mythic conflict scenes.
No geographic location is named in this verse.
The verse frames a debate about proportionality and legitimacy in violence—questioning whether destruction is 'yukta' (proper) even within a conflict narrative.
Ask anything about this verse
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free Google sign-in keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Varaha Purana in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with word-by-word meanings, Sanskrit recitation where available, and more.