Bharata’s Attachment and the Palanquin Teaching on ‘I’ and ‘Mine’
राजोवाच । धर्माधर्मौ न संदेहः सर्वकार्येषु कारणम् । उपभोगनिमित्तं च देहाद्देहांतरागमः ॥ ७४ ॥
rājovāca | dharmādharmau na saṃdehaḥ sarvakāryeṣu kāraṇam | upabhoganimittaṃ ca dehāddehāṃtarāgamaḥ || 74 ||
Wika ng Hari: Walang pag-aalinlangan na ang dharma at adharma ang sanhi ng lahat ng gawa at ng mga bunga nito; at upang danasin ang bunga ng karma, ang nilalang ay lumilipat mula sa isang katawan tungo sa iba.
The King (Rājā)
Vrata: none
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: none
It states a core Moksha-Dharma principle: moral causality governs experience—dharma and adharma generate results, and rebirth occurs so the jīva can undergo those karmic fruits until liberation is sought.
By highlighting bondage through karma and rebirth, it implicitly points to the need for a liberating path; in Narada Purana, Vishnu-bhakti is taught as a means to purify karma, lessen attachment to “upabhoga,” and move toward moksha.
No specific Vedanga (like Vyākaraṇa, Jyotiṣa, or Kalpa) is directly taught in this verse; the takeaway is ethical-ritual causality (karma-phala), which underlies Vedic conduct and prescribed duties.