Varaha Purana 17.65 — Adhyaya 17, Shloka 65
King Prajāpāla’s Visit to Sage Mahātapā’s Hermitage and the Doctrinal Praise of Nārāyaṇa
शरीराणि पुनर्नैवं कर्त्तव्योऽहमिति क्वचित् । मूर्त्तीनां च तथा तुभ्यं दद्मि नामानि वोऽधुना ॥ १७.६५ ॥
śarīrāṇi punarnaivaṁ karttavyo'ham iti kvacit | mūrttīnāṁ ca tathā tubhyaṁ dadmi nāmāni vo'dhunā || 17.65 ||
“ต่อไปอย่าได้สร้างกายเช่นนี้ที่ใดด้วยความคิดว่า ‘เรานี่แหละเป็นผู้กระทำ’ และบัดนี้เราจะประทานนามแห่งรูปมูรติทั้งหลายแก่พวกเจ้าด้วย”
Varāha
Varaha Avatara Context: {"is_varaha_focus":true,"aspect_highlighted":"dialogue","boar_form_detail":"None","earth_interaction":"Varāha instructs against egoic doership in fashioning bodies and proceeds to assign names to mūrti-forms—guiding how beings relate to form and worship."}
Bhu Devi Dialogue: {"is_dialogue":true,"speaker_role":"instructor","bhu_devi_state":"receptive; seeking ethical clarity about agency and form","key_question":"How should embodied creation proceed without egoic doership, and what are the proper names/identities of the granted mūrti-forms?"}
Mathura Mandala: {"is_mathura_related":false,"specific_site":"None","parikrama_context":"None","krishna_connection":"None"}
Dharma Shastra: {"has_dharma_rule":true,"topic":"None","instruction_summary":"Do not create/act with the conceit ‘I am the doer’; recognize agency as subordinate to the divine and proceed with humility and right naming/order of forms.","karmic_consequence":"Egoic doership binds to saṃsāra and disorder; humility and right orientation to īśvara supports harmony, right worship, and liberation-leaning merit."}
Vrata Mahatmya: {"has_vrata":false,"vrata_name":"None","tithi_month":"None","promised_fruit":"None"}
Cosmic Boar Symbolism: {"has_symbolism":true,"symbolic_interpretation":"Naming mūrti-forms and warning against ‘kartṛtva’ frames iconography and embodiment as divinely regulated manifestations, not autonomous human/creaturely self-assertion—linking ritual form (mūrti) with inner renunciation of ego.","yajna_varaha_imagery":"None","vedantic_connection":"Aligns with karma-yoga/vedāntic critique of ahaṅkāra: actions occur through guṇas and divine ordinance; the wise relinquish ‘I do’ while honoring sacred forms as supports for devotion."}
Philosophical Teaching: {"has_teaching":true,"teaching_type":"ethics of agency (ahaṅkāra-tyāga) + sacred semiotics (nāma)","core_concept":"Renounce the notion of independent doership; names/forms are functional designations within divine order.","practical_application":"Perform duties and creative work as offering (īśvara-arpaṇa), avoid ego-claims; in worship, honor mūrti-nāma with clarity and reverence rather than self-made arbitrariness."}
Subject Matter: ["Ethics","Iconography","Philosophy (agency/ego)"]
Primary Rasa: śānta
Secondary Rasa: vīra
Type: metaphysical/ritual-theological context
Related Themes: Varāha Purāṇa 17.17.62-64 (līlā, forms, manifest/unmanifest)
Visual Art Cues: {"scene_description":"Varāha/Deva instructs a gathered assembly: a cautionary gesture against ego (‘I am the doer’) and then a formal bestowal of names to icon-forms, as if labeling sacred manifestations.","item_prompts":["teaching gesture (tarjani/abhaya)","scroll or symbolic ‘names’ emanating as syllables","icon-forms/mūrtis arranged in order","listeners in reverent posture"],"kerala_mural_prompt":"Kerala mural: deity admonishing with composed authority, stylized Sanskrit syllables as decorative motifs, orderly mūrti icons in a row.","tanjore_prompt":"Tanjore: gold-leaf emphasis on deity and halos, embossed syllabic garlands indicating naming, symmetrical icon arrangement.","mysore_prompt":"Mysore: fine linework for syllables/names, dignified didactic scene, soft illumination on mūrti forms.","pahari_prompt":"Pahari: narrative scene with delicate calligraphic ‘nāma’ ribbons, gentle expressions, emphasis on moral instruction."}
Audio Atmosphere: {"recitation_mood":"didactic, purifying","suggested_raga":"Shankarabharanam","pace":"medium-slow","voice_tone":"firm, clear, compassionate"}
FAQs
It reflects a Purāṇic didactic style that pairs practical instruction with a philosophical caution against egoic authorship (“aham iti”), a theme common in South Asian textual traditions discussing agency and ritual or creative acts.
No geographic location is named in this verse fragment; the content is primarily ethical and classificatory (introducing names of mūrtis).
To avoid undertaking actions with an ego-centered claim of doership (“I am the maker/doer”), framing subsequent instruction (naming of forms) within a disciplined, non-egotistic approach.
Ask anything about this verse
A free Google sign-in keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Varaha Purana in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with audio, word-by-word meanings, and more.