Varaha Purana 162.37 — Adhyaya 162, Shloka 37
The Efficacy and Merit of Cakra-tīrtha
तेन दोषेण विप्रर्षे ब्रह्महत्याफलं तव ॥ आसन्नशयनाच्चैनं भोजनात्कथनादिषु ॥
tena doṣeṇa viprarṣe brahmahatyāphalaṁ tava || āsannaśayanāc cainaṁ bhojanāt kathanādiṣu ||
ด้วยโทษนั้นเอง โอ้ฤๅษีผู้ประเสริฐในหมู่พราหมณ์ ผลกรรมแห่งการฆ่าพราหมณ์ย่อมตกแก่ท่าน—ด้วยการนอนใกล้เขา การร่วมรับประทานอาหาร การสนทนา และสิ่งอื่นทำนองนั้น
Śvaśura (father-in-law) (contextual continuation of admonition)
Varaha Avatara Context: {"is_varaha_focus":false}
Bhu Devi Dialogue: {"is_dialogue":true,"speaker_role":"instructor","bhu_devi_state":"sobering realization; cautious about social purity and ethical proximity","key_question":"What forms of association transmit or implicate one in another’s grave sin, and how should one regulate proximity, commensality, and speech?"}
Mathura Mandala: {"is_mathura_related":false}
Dharma Shastra: {"has_dharma_rule":true,"topic":"prayaschitta","instruction_summary":"Mahāpātaka-fruit can accrue through saṅga: close sleeping/proximity, eating together, conversation, and similar intimate associations with the tainted person.","karmic_consequence":"Avoiding prohibited association prevents doṣa-saṅkrama/implication; maintaining such intimacy draws the stated mahāpātaka consequence and necessitates heavier expiation."}
Vrata Mahatmya: {"has_vrata":false}
Cosmic Boar Symbolism: {"has_symbolism":false}
Philosophical Teaching: {"has_teaching":true,"teaching_type":"ethics-of-association","core_concept":"Moral life is relational: intimacy (śayana, bhojana, kathana) can constitute participation; responsibility extends beyond direct action to enabling/endorsing proximity.","practical_application":"Maintain discernment in companionship and shared meals; when serious adharma is present, create boundaries and seek purification/expiation per śāstra."}
Subject Matter: ["Ethics","Social Conduct","Ritual Purity"]
Primary Rasa: śānta
Secondary Rasa: bhayānaka
Type: domestic/household setting
Related Themes: Varāha Purāṇa 162.36 (prāyaścitta and ritual prohibition as response framework); Varāha Purāṇa 162.38-39 (accusation and inquiry leading to this rule)
Visual Art Cues: {"scene_description":"The father-in-law explains the mechanism of fault: the son-in-law is implicated through intimate association—sleeping near, eating with, and conversing with the tainted person.","item_prompts":["elder enumerating with fingers (counting faults)","vignettes or symbolic icons: bed/mat (śayana), shared meal (bhojana), two figures speaking (kathana)","son-in-law listening, chastened","a boundary line or separated seating to symbolize avoidance"],"kerala_mural_prompt":"Kerala mural: didactic composition with symbolic mini-scenes (bed, meal, dialogue) around the central teacher; strong outlines; serious expressions.","tanjore_prompt":"Tanjore: gold-rich central figures; surrounding medallions depicting śayana/bhojana/kathana; ornate but morally weighty tableau.","mysore_prompt":"Mysore: classical restraint; central dialogue with subtle inset motifs for the three associations; emphasis on clarity and instruction.","pahari_prompt":"Pahari: narrative panels or soft inset scenes; delicate depiction of household acts (sleeping mat, shared plate, conversation) conveying ethical caution."}
Audio Atmosphere: {"recitation_mood":"didactic, cautionary","suggested_raga":"Bhairavi","pace":"medium-slow","voice_tone":"measured, enumerative, warning emphasis on the listed associations"}
FAQs
It preserves a social-ethical theory in which proximity and shared acts (sleeping nearby, eating, speaking) can transmit moral/ritual taint, paralleling Dharmaśāstra purity logics.
No geographic location is identified here.
It warns that intimate association can entail shared consequences for grave wrongdoing, emphasizing caution in companionship and conduct.
Ask anything about this verse
A free Google sign-in keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Varaha Purana in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with audio, word-by-word meanings, and more.