तच्छ्रुत्वा वचनं तस्य मद्भर्तुः साब्रवीदिदम् । विश्वस्तहिंसनं ब्रह्मन् ब्रह्महत्या समं भवेत् ॥ २५ ॥
tacchrutvā vacanaṃ tasya madbhartuḥ sābravīdidam | viśvastahiṃsanaṃ brahman brahmahatyā samaṃ bhavet || 25 ||
ครั้นได้ฟังถ้อยคำของสามี นางกล่าวว่า “ข้าแต่พราหมณ์ การทำร้ายผู้ที่ไว้วางใจย่อมเป็นบาปเสมอด้วยบาปพราหมณ์ฆาต (พรหมหัตยา)”
A wife (speaking in response to her husband's words; narrative voice within the Tirtha/Dharma episode)
Vrata: none
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: karuna
It elevates “trust” (viśvāsa) to a sacred ethical bond: violence against one who relies on you is treated as a mahāpātaka-level offense, stressing inner dharma beyond mere external ritual.
Bhakti in the Purāṇic sense is inseparable from sāttvika conduct—non-violence, protection of the vulnerable, and truthfulness. Betraying a trust violates the moral foundation that supports worship and tīrtha practice.
It reflects Dharmic jurisprudence (smṛti-style nīti) rather than a technical Vedāṅga lesson; the practical takeaway is ethical restraint (ahiṁsā) and avoidance of mahāpātakas like brahmahatyā.