Narada Purana — Purva Bhaga, Shloka 80
Bharata’s Attachment and the Palanquin Teaching on ‘I’ and ‘Mine’
पिंडः पृथग्यतः पुंसः शिरःपाण्यादिलक्षणः । ततोऽहमिति कुत्रैनां संज्ञां राजन्करोम्यहम् ॥ ८० ॥
piṃḍaḥ pṛthagyataḥ puṃsaḥ śiraḥpāṇyādilakṣaṇaḥ | tato'hamiti kutraināṃ saṃjñāṃ rājankaromyaham || 80 ||
ข้าแต่มหาราช ก้อนกายนี้ที่มีศีรษะ มือ และลักษณะอื่น ๆ ย่อมแยกต่างหากจากบุรุษ (อาตมัน). แล้วเราจะนำคำว่า ‘เรา’ ไปกำหนดแก่กายนี้ ณ ที่ใดจึงจะถูกต้อง?
Sanatkumara (teaching a king in the Moksha-dharma dialogue)
Vrata: none
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: none
FAQs
It teaches viveka (discernment): the body is an observable aggregate with parts, while the true person is distinct; therefore the “I” sense should not be imposed on the body, which supports liberation-oriented self-inquiry.
By weakening body-identification and egoic “I-ness,” the practitioner becomes inwardly purified and fit for single-pointed devotion; bhakti matures when the devotee offers body and mind as instruments rather than mistaking them as the Self.
No specific Vedanga (like Vyakarana, Jyotisha, or Kalpa) is taught directly; the practical takeaway is adhyatma-viveka—using careful inquiry into terms like “I” (aham) and “person” (pums) to correct wrong identification.