Shloka 20
Adhyaya 4 — Jaimini Meets the Dharmapakshis: Four Doubts on the Mahabharata and the Opening of Narayana Doctrine
अथवा नैतदुक्तं हि सम्यगस्माभिरादृतैः ।
भवता सङ्गमो येषां तेषामकुशलं कुतः ॥
athavā naitad uktaṃ hi samyag asmābhir ādṛtaiḥ | bhavatā saṅgamo yeṣāṃ teṣām akuśalaṃ kutaḥ ||
หรือแท้จริงแล้ว คำที่เรากล่าวนั้นไม่ถูกต้องนัก แม้เราจะกล่าวด้วยความเคารพ; ผู้ใดได้คบหาท่านแล้ว ความอัปมงคลจะเกิดแก่เขาได้อย่างไร?
{ "primaryRasa": "bhakti", "secondaryRasa": "shanta", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
FAQs
The verse elevates the moral power of noble company: association with a virtuous or spiritually eminent person is itself protective and auspicious. It implies that ‘evil outcomes’ are not intrinsic to such association; rather, good company is a cause of welfare (śubha) and a restraint on adharma.
This verse is best classified under ethical instruction within the Purāṇic frame-narrative, not directly under the five cosmological markers. It aligns most loosely with ‘vaṃśānucarita’ (accounts of conduct/character) in the sense that it comments on the qualities and influence of a person, but it is primarily didactic dialogue rather than sarga/pratisarga/manvantara/vaṃśa.
On an inner level, ‘association (saṅga)’ can be read as the mind’s contact with a higher principle (guru, sattva, dharma). When consciousness ‘associates’ with the elevating influence, the seeds of akuśala (unwholesome karmic tendencies) fail to find a supporting ground—suggesting that right alignment itself dissolves misfortune at its root.