Previous Verse
Next Verse

Varaha Purana 162.37 — Adhyaya 162, Shloka 37

The Efficacy and Merit of Cakra-tīrtha

तेन दोषेण विप्रर्षे ब्रह्महत्याफलं तव ॥ आसन्नशयनाच्चैनं भोजनात्कथनादिषु ॥

tena doṣeṇa viprarṣe brahmahatyāphalaṁ tava || āsannaśayanāc cainaṁ bhojanāt kathanādiṣu ||

‘ఓ విప్రర్షే! ఆ దోషం వల్లనే నీకు బ్రహ్మహత్యా ఫలం—అతని సమీపంలో శయనం చేయడం వల్ల, అతనితో కలిసి భోజనం చేయడం వల్ల, అతనితో సంభాషణ మొదలైన వాటి వల్ల.’

तेनby that / because of that
तेन:
Karaṇa (करण)
TypeNoun
Rootतद् (सर्वनाम-प्रातिपदिक)
Formपुंलिङ्गे/नपुंसकलिङ्गे, तृतीया-विभक्ति (करण/सह), एकवचन; सर्वनाम
दोषेणby the fault
दोषेण:
Karaṇa (करण)
TypeNoun
Rootदोष (प्रातिपदिक)
Formपुंलिङ्ग, तृतीया-विभक्ति, एकवचन
विप्रर्षेO brahmin-sage
विप्रर्षे:
Sambodhana (सम्बोधन)
TypeNoun
Rootविप्रर्षि (प्रातिपदिक)
Formपुंलिङ्ग, सम्बोधन-विभक्ति, एकवचन
ब्रह्महत्याफलम्the fruit/result of brahmin-slaying
ब्रह्महत्याफलम्:
Karta (कर्ता)
TypeNoun
Rootब्रह्महत्या + फल (प्रातिपदिक)
Formनपुंसकलिङ्ग, प्रथमा-विभक्ति, एकवचन; षष्ठी-तत्पुरुष (ब्रह्महत्यायाः फलम्)
तवof you / your
तव:
Sambandha/Śeṣa (सम्बन्ध/षष्ठी)
TypeNoun
Rootयुष्मद् (सर्वनाम-प्रातिपदिक)
Formषष्ठी-विभक्ति, एकवचन; सर्वनाम
आसन्नशयनात्from lying/sleeping near (him)
आसन्नशयनात्:
Apādāna (अपादान)
TypeNoun
Rootआसन्न + शयन (प्रातिपदिक)
Formनपुंसकलिङ्ग, पञ्चमी-विभक्ति, एकवचन; कर्मधारय/तत्पुरुष-समास (आसन्नं शयनम्)
and
:
Samuccaya (समुच्चय)
TypeIndeclinable
Rootच (अव्यय)
Formसमुच्चय-अव्यय (conjunction)
एनम्him
एनम्:
Karma (कर्म)
TypeNoun
Rootएतद् (सर्वनाम-प्रातिपदिक)
Formपुंलिङ्ग, द्वितीया-विभक्ति, एकवचन; सर्वनाम
भोजनात्from eating (with him)
भोजनात्:
Apādāna (अपादान)
TypeNoun
Rootभोजन (प्रातिपदिक)
Formनपुंसकलिङ्ग, पञ्चमी-विभक्ति, एकवचन
कथनादिषुin speaking and the like
कथनादिषु:
Adhikaraṇa (अधिकरण)
TypeNoun
Rootकथन + आदि (प्रातिपदिक)
Formनपुंसकलिङ्ग, सप्तमी-विभक्ति, बहुवचन; समाहार/तत्पुरुष (कथनं च आदयः येषु)

Śvaśura (father-in-law) (contextual continuation of admonition)

Varaha Avatara Context: {"is_varaha_focus":false,"aspect_highlighted":"None","boar_form_detail":"None","earth_interaction":"None"}

Bhu Devi Dialogue: {"is_dialogue":true,"speaker_role":"instructor","bhu_devi_state":"sobering realization; cautious about social purity and ethical proximity","key_question":"What forms of association transmit or implicate one in another’s grave sin, and how should one regulate proximity, commensality, and speech?"}

Mathura Mandala: {"is_mathura_related":false,"specific_site":"None","parikrama_context":"None","krishna_connection":"None"}

Dharma Shastra: {"has_dharma_rule":true,"topic":"prayaschitta","instruction_summary":"Mahāpātaka-fruit can accrue through saṅga: close sleeping/proximity, eating together, conversation, and similar intimate associations with the tainted person.","karmic_consequence":"Avoiding prohibited association prevents doṣa-saṅkrama/implication; maintaining such intimacy draws the stated mahāpātaka consequence and necessitates heavier expiation."}

Vrata Mahatmya: {"has_vrata":false,"vrata_name":"None","tithi_month":"None","promised_fruit":"None"}

Cosmic Boar Symbolism: {"has_symbolism":false,"symbolic_interpretation":"None","yajna_varaha_imagery":"None","vedantic_connection":"None"}

Philosophical Teaching: {"has_teaching":true,"teaching_type":"ethics-of-association","core_concept":"Moral life is relational: intimacy (śayana, bhojana, kathana) can constitute participation; responsibility extends beyond direct action to enabling/endorsing proximity.","practical_application":"Maintain discernment in companionship and shared meals; when serious adharma is present, create boundaries and seek purification/expiation per śāstra."}

Subject Matter: ["Ethics","Social Conduct","Ritual Purity"]

Primary Rasa: śānta

Secondary Rasa: bhayānaka

Type: domestic/household setting

Related Themes: Varāha Purāṇa 162.36 (prāyaścitta and ritual prohibition as response framework); Varāha Purāṇa 162.38-39 (accusation and inquiry leading to this rule)

Visual Art Cues: {"scene_description":"The father-in-law explains the mechanism of fault: the son-in-law is implicated through intimate association—sleeping near, eating with, and conversing with the tainted person.","item_prompts":["elder enumerating with fingers (counting faults)","vignettes or symbolic icons: bed/mat (śayana), shared meal (bhojana), two figures speaking (kathana)","son-in-law listening, chastened","a boundary line or separated seating to symbolize avoidance"],"kerala_mural_prompt":"Kerala mural: didactic composition with symbolic mini-scenes (bed, meal, dialogue) around the central teacher; strong outlines; serious expressions.","tanjore_prompt":"Tanjore: gold-rich central figures; surrounding medallions depicting śayana/bhojana/kathana; ornate but morally weighty tableau.","mysore_prompt":"Mysore: classical restraint; central dialogue with subtle inset motifs for the three associations; emphasis on clarity and instruction.","pahari_prompt":"Pahari: narrative panels or soft inset scenes; delicate depiction of household acts (sleeping mat, shared plate, conversation) conveying ethical caution."}

Audio Atmosphere: {"recitation_mood":"didactic, cautionary","suggested_raga":"Bhairavi","pace":"medium-slow","voice_tone":"measured, enumerative, warning emphasis on the listed associations"}

D
Dharmaśāstric Concepts
P
Purāṇic Ethics
S
Social Contagion of Pāpa
C
Classical Literature

FAQs

It preserves a social-ethical theory in which proximity and shared acts (sleeping nearby, eating, speaking) can transmit moral/ritual taint, paralleling Dharmaśāstra purity logics.

No geographic location is identified here.

It warns that intimate association can entail shared consequences for grave wrongdoing, emphasizing caution in companionship and conduct.

AI

Ask anything about this verse

Curious about the meaning, context, or a word? Ask, and continue the conversation in the Vedapath app.

A free Google sign-in keeps your chat saved across web and the app.

Read Varaha Purana in the Vedapath app

Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with audio, word-by-word meanings, and more.

Continue reading in the Vedapath app

Open in App