Varaha Purana 112.35 — Adhyaya 112, Shloka 35
Praise and Procedure of Donating the Two-Faced Kapilā Cow and the Golden Pot
Hema-kumbha
महापातकयुक्तोऽपि वञ्चको ब्रह्मदूषकः ॥ निन्दको ब्राह्मणानां च तथा कर्मावदूषकः
mahāpātakayukto 'pi vañcako brahmadūṣakaḥ || nindako brāhmaṇānāṃ ca tathā karmāvadūṣakaḥ
महापातकयुक्तोऽपि वञ्चको ब्रह्मदूषकः। ब्राह्मणनिन्दकश्चैव तथा कर्मावदूषकः (अत्र परिगण्यते)।
Varāha (default, instructional voice in dialogue framework)
Varaha Avatara Context: {"is_varaha_focus":false}
Bhu Devi Dialogue: {"is_dialogue":false,"speaker_role":"instructor"}
Mathura Mandala: {"is_mathura_related":false}
Dharma Shastra: {"has_dharma_rule":true,"topic":"prayaschitta","instruction_summary":"The purificatory scope extends even to mahāpātakins and social-religious offenders: deceivers, defilers of brahma-vidyā/śāstra, revilers of brāhmaṇas, and disparagers of karma (ritual duty).","karmic_consequence":"Such offenders are not excluded from purification if they undertake the prescribed remedy; persistent nindā and dharma-contempt deepen demerit and social-spiritual downfall."}
Vrata Mahatmya: {"has_vrata":false}
Cosmic Boar Symbolism: {"has_symbolism":false}
Philosophical Teaching: {"has_teaching":true,"teaching_type":"ethics of speech and reverence","core_concept":"Dharma is upheld not only by acts but by honoring the sources of dharma (śāstra, brāhmaṇas, ritual obligations); contempt corrodes one’s inner fitness (adhikāra).","practical_application":"Avoid nindā (slander) of teachers, brāhmaṇas, and rites; cultivate śraddhā and truthful conduct; when fallen, seek corrective action rather than doubling down."}
Subject Matter: ["Ethics","Ritual Studies","Social History"]
Primary Rasa: śānta
Secondary Rasa: raudra
Related Themes: Varāha Purāṇa 112.36 (grave sins listed); Varāha Purāṇa 112.38–112.39 (purification via go-dāna and observance details)
Visual Art Cues: {"scene_description":"A moral tableau: Varāha enumerates categories of offenders—deceit, slander, contempt for sacred learning and ritual—while indicating they still fall within the reach of purification.","item_prompts":["Varāha with counting gesture (enumeration)","symbolic figures representing deceit (masked face), slander (pointing tongue), scripture defilement (torn manuscript icon)","a calm corrective aura indicating possibility of purification"],"kerala_mural_prompt":"Kerala mural: allegorical side-panels with symbolic offenders; Varāha central in teaching posture; muted dramatic contrast without grotesquery; temple interior framing.","tanjore_prompt":"Tanjore: central Varāha with gold halo; small narrative vignettes around showing ‘nindā’ and ‘karma-avadoṣa’ as icons; rich ornamentation.","mysore_prompt":"Mysore: refined allegory—manuscript, speech-scroll, ritual fire—shown as motifs; Varāha’s calm authority dominates.","pahari_prompt":"Pahari: storybook vignettes in borders; Varāha addressing an unseen audience; gentle satire in offender depictions; pastel palette."}
Audio Atmosphere: {"recitation_mood":"admonitory, clarifying","suggested_raga":"Bhairav","pace":"medium","voice_tone":"firm, precise"}
FAQs
The verse preserves a moral vocabulary shared with Dharmaśāstra traditions, showing how Purāṇas echoed and adapted juridical-ethical categories for devotional instruction.
None; the focus is ethical typology rather than sacred geography.
To recognize socially defined categories of harm—deception, denigration of learning and ritual, and social disparagement—as serious moral faults within the text’s ethical framework.
Ask anything about this verse
A free Google sign-in keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Varaha Purana in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with audio, word-by-word meanings, and more.