Adhyaya 17: लिङ्गोद्भव—ब्रह्मविष्ण्वहङ्कार-शमनं, ओंकार-प्रादुर्भावः, मन्त्र-तत्त्वं च
अपृच्छन् भगवंल्लिङ्गं कथमासीदिति स्वयम् लिङ्गे महेश्वरो रुद्रः समभ्यर्च्यः कथं त्विति
apṛcchan bhagavaṃlliṅgaṃ kathamāsīditi svayam liṅge maheśvaro rudraḥ samabhyarcyaḥ kathaṃ tviti
Eles perguntaram ao próprio Liṅga venerável: “Como vieste a existir?” E novamente perguntaram: “De que modo Mahēśvara—Rudra, o Pati que habita no Liṅga—deve ser adorado corretamente no Liṅga?”
Suta Goswami (narrating the sages’ inquiry within the Linga-Pradurbhava account)
It frames two core concerns of Linga-upasana: the ontological origin of the Linga (why it is the supreme sign of Pati) and the correct method of worship (samabhyarcana) directed to Maheshvara present in and as the Linga.
Shiva is indicated as Maheshvara-Rudra, the Pati, who is not merely represented by the Linga but is worshipped in the Linga—implying immanence (presence in the emblem) and transcendence (the Lordhood that the emblem signifies).
The verse points to samabhyarcana—complete, rule-guided worship of Rudra in the Linga—forming the ritual foundation that supports Pashupata-oriented discipline: devotion, purity, and focused contemplation of Pati to loosen Pasha (bondage) upon the Pashu (soul).