Shloka 16
Satī at Dakṣa’s Sacrifice: Condemnation of Blasphemy and Voluntary Departure by Yoga-Fire
किं वा शिवाख्यमशिवं न विदुस्त्वदन्ये ब्रह्मादयस्तमवकीर्य जटा: श्मशाने । तन्माल्यभस्मनृकपाल्यवसत्पिशाचै- र्ये मूर्धभिर्दधति तच्चरणावसृष्टम् ॥ १६ ॥
kiṁ vā śivākhyam aśivaṁ na vidus tvad anye brahmādayas tam avakīrya jaṭāḥ śmaśāne tan-mālya-bhasma-nṛkapāly avasat piśācair ye mūrdhabhir dadhati tac-caraṇāvasṛṣṭam
Achas que personalidades maiores e mais respeitáveis do que tu, como Brahmā, não conhecem aquele a quem o mundo chama Śiva, embora o considerem «inauspicioso»? Ele habita o crematório, tem as jatas espalhadas, usa guirlandas de crânios humanos e se unge com cinzas, convivendo com piśācas; e, ainda assim, Brahmā e os grandes o honram, tomando as flores oferecidas a seus pés de lótus e colocando-as com reverência sobre a cabeça.
It is useless to condemn a great personality like Lord Śiva, and this is being stated by his wife, Satī, to establish the supremacy of her husband. First she said, “You call Lord Śiva inauspicious because he associates with demons in crematoriums, covers his body with the ashes of the dead, and garlands himself with the skulls of human beings. You have shown so many defects, but you do not know that his position is always transcendental. Although he appears inauspicious, why do personalities like Brahmā respect the dust of his lotus feet and place on their heads with great respect those very garlands which are condemned by you?” Since Satī was a chaste woman and the wife of Lord Śiva, it was her duty to establish the elevated position of Lord Śiva, not only by sentiment but by facts. Lord Śiva is not an ordinary living entity. This is the conclusion of Vedic scripture. He is neither on the level of the Supreme Personality of Godhead nor on the level of the ordinary living entities. Brahmā is in almost all cases an ordinary living entity. Sometimes, when there is no ordinary living entity available, the post of Brahmā is occupied by an expansion of Lord Viṣṇu, but generally this post is occupied by a greatly pious living entity within this universe. Thus Lord Śiva’s position is constitutionally higher than that of Lord Brahmā, although Lord Śiva appeared as the son of Brahmā. Here it is mentioned that even personalities like Brahmā accept the so-called inauspicious flowers and the dust of the lotus feet of Lord Śiva. Great sages like Marīci, Atri, Bhṛgu and the others among the nine great sages who are descendants of Brahmā also respect Lord Śiva in such a way because they all know that Lord Śiva is not an ordinary living entity.
FAQs
This verse says non-devotees—even great devas like Brahmā—may misjudge Śiva because he lives in cremation grounds with ash and skulls, but these become worshipable because they are sanctified by the dust from Śiva’s feet.
Daksha criticized and insulted Lord Śiva; Sati responds by explaining that people who lack devotion misunderstand Śiva’s transcendental position and wrongly label him “inauspicious.”
Do not evaluate spiritual people only by external markers; cultivate devotion and humility, and avoid offenses that arise from superficial judgment.