अरक्षितं तिष्ठति दैवरक्षितं सुरक्षितं दैवहतं विनश्यति । जीवत्यनाथोऽपि वने विसर्जितः कृतप्रयत्नोऽपि गृहे न जीवति
arakṣitaṃ tiṣṭhati daivarakṣitaṃ surakṣitaṃ daivahataṃ vinaśyati | jīvatyanātho'pi vane visarjitaḥ kṛtaprayatno'pi gṛhe na jīvati
ଅରକ୍ଷିତ ମଧ୍ୟ ଯଦି ଦୈବରକ୍ଷିତ ହୁଏ ତେବେ ଟିକି ରହେ; ସୁରକ୍ଷିତ ମଧ୍ୟ ଦୈବାଘାତରେ ବିନଶିଯାଏ। ବନରେ ତ୍ୟକ୍ତ ଅନାଥ ମଧ୍ୟ ବଞ୍ଚେ, ଘରେ ଅତି ପ୍ରୟାସୀ ମଧ୍ୟ ବଞ୍ଚିପାରେ ନାହିଁ।
Unspecified (deduced: Sūta/Lomaharṣaṇa narrating within a Māhātmya discourse)
Scene: Two contrasting vignettes: (1) an unguarded hut spared under a protective aura; (2) a fortified house struck by calamity; alongside, an abandoned child in a forest surviving under divine protection, contrasted with a striving householder failing—rendered as moral paradox, not despair.
Human precautions and effort do not fully control outcomes; destiny shaped by karma can preserve or destroy beyond visible safeguards.
This maxim occurs inside the Śrīhāṭakeśvara-kṣetra Māhātmya (Nāgarakhaṇḍa, Tīrthamāhātmya), supporting the narrative’s moral frame.
None; it is a reflective teaching on daiva (destiny) and prayatna (effort).