Dāyavibhāga (Inheritance Apportionment) and Household Precedence — Dialogue of Yudhiṣṭhira and Bhīṣma
गृहीतपाणिरेका5<सीत् _प्राप्तशुल्का पराभवत् | कन्या गृहीता तत्रैव विसर्ज्या इति मे पिता
gṛhītapāṇir ekā āsīt prāptaśulkā parābhavat | kanyā gṛhītā tatraiva visarjyā iti me pitā |
ଭୀଷ୍ମ କହିଲେ—ସେମାନଙ୍କ ମଧ୍ୟରୁ ଗୋଟିଏ କନ୍ୟାର ପାଣିଗ୍ରହଣ ପୂର୍ବରୁ ହୋଇଥିଲା; ଅନ୍ୟ କନ୍ୟା ବିଷୟରେ କାଶିରାଜ ଶୁଳ୍କ ଗ୍ରହଣ କରିଥିଲେ। ତେଣୁ ମୋ ପିତା (ବଂଶର ଜ୍ୟେଷ୍ଠ) ସେଠାରେ କହିଲେ—“ଯାହାର ପାଣିଗ୍ରହଣ ହୋଇଛି, ସେ କନ୍ୟାକୁ ଏଠାରେ ମୁକ୍ତ କର; ଅନ୍ୟ କନ୍ୟାଙ୍କ ସହ ବିବାହ କର।” କିନ୍ତୁ ଏହି କଥାରେ ମୋତେ ସନ୍ଦେହ ହେଲା; ତେଣୁ ମୁଁ ଅନ୍ୟମାନଙ୍କୁ ମଧ୍ୟ ଧର୍ମନିର୍ଣ୍ଣୟ ପଚାରିଲି।
भीष्य उवाच
The verse highlights dharma as a careful weighing of competing marital claims: a prior personal commitment (pāṇigrahaṇa/accepted husband) can override later force or arrangement, while a mere financial transaction (śulka received) creates a different kind of obligation. Bhishma also models ethical caution by seeking clarification when unsure.
After the Kāśī princesses are brought to the Kuru side, it is disclosed that Ambā has already mentally/ritually accepted Śālva. The family elder rules that she should be released, while the others—whose marriage arrangements are tied to the received śulka—should proceed to marriage. Bhishma admits doubt and consults others about the correct dharma.