Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 153

Satya–Anṛta Viveka (Discrimination between Truth and Falsehood) | सत्य–अनृत विवेकः

श्रेयस्तत्रानृतं वक्तुं सत्यादिति विचारितम्‌ | यदि न बतानेसे उस धनीका बचाव हो जाता हो तो किसी तरह वहाँ कुछ बोले ही नहीं; परंतु यदि बोलना अनिवार्य हो जाय और न बोलनेसे लुटेरोंके मनमें संदेह पैदा होने लगे तो वहाँ सत्य बोलनेकी अपेक्षा झूठ बोलनेमें ही कल्याण है; यही इस विषयमें विचारपूर्वक निर्णय किया गया है

śreyas tatrānṛtaṁ vaktuṁ satyād iti vicāritam |

ဘိဿမက မိန့်ကြားသည်—ဤသို့သောအခြေအနေတွင် စဉ်းစားသုံးသပ်၍ ဆုံးဖြတ်ထားသည်မှာ အမှန်ကိုပြောခြင်းထက် မမှန်ကိုပြောခြင်းက ပို၍အကျိုးရှိသည်ဟူသောအချက်ပင် ဖြစ်သည်။ အမှန်တရားက ချမ်းသာသူတစ်ဦးကို အန္တရာယ်ထဲသို့ ထုတ်ဖော်ပေးမည်—ဥပမာ လုယက်သူတို့က ဖမ်းဆီးယူသွားမည်—ဆိုလျှင်၊ ထို့ပြင် မပြောဘဲနေခြင်းက သံသယကို ဖြစ်စေသဖြင့် မဖြစ်နိုင်လျှင်၊ ကာကွယ်ရန်အတွက် ပြောသော မမှန်စကားကို ဓမ္မအရ ပိုကောင်းသောလမ်းဟု သတ်မှတ်ကြသည်။

[{'term''śreyas', 'definition': 'the better good
[{'term':
what is more beneficial or conducive to welfare'}, {'term''tatra', 'definition': 'there
what is more beneficial or conducive to welfare'}, {'term':
in that situation/context'}, {'term''anṛtam', 'definition': 'untruth
in that situation/context'}, {'term':
false statement (as opposed to satya)'}, {'term''vaktum', 'definition': 'to speak
false statement (as opposed to satya)'}, {'term':
to say'}, {'term''satyāt', 'definition': 'than truth
to say'}, {'term':
from/compared to truth'}, {'term''iti', 'definition': 'thus
from/compared to truth'}, {'term':
in this manner (marking the conclusion/quotation)'}, {'term''vicāritam', 'definition': 'considered, deliberated, decided after reflection'}]
in this manner (marking the conclusion/quotation)'}, {'term':

भीष्म उवाच

B
Bhishma

Educational Q&A

When truth-telling would directly cause harm, and silence is not a viable option, dharma may favor a protective untruth; the criterion is śreyas—what best preserves welfare and prevents injury.

In Bhishma’s instruction on dharma in the Shanti Parva, he addresses a practical ethical case: if speaking the truth would enable wrongdoers (e.g., robbers) to harm a person, then after deliberation it is deemed better to speak a falsehood rather than facilitate harm through truth.