Shloka 170
कुम्भकर्णवधः
The Slaying of Kumbhakarna
स तन्महापर्वतकूटसन्निभंविवृत्तदंष्ट्रंचलचारुकुण्डलम् ।चकर्तरक्षोधिपतेश्शिरस्तदायथैववृत्रस्यपुरापुरन्दरः ।।।।
sa tanmahāparvatakūṭasannibhaṁ vivṛttadaṁṣṭraṁ calacārukuṇḍalam |
cakarta rakṣodhipateś śiras tadā yathaiva vṛtrasya purā purandaraḥ ||
Lalu Rāma menebas putus kepala raja rākṣasa itu—yang rupanya laksana puncak gunung besar, bertaring terjulur, dengan subang indah yang bergoyang—sebagaimana dahulu Purandara (Indra) memenggal kepala Vṛtra.
The arrow (of Rama) severed the head of Rakshasa king whose body was like a lofty mountain peak, whose teeth were large and protruded, hanging earrings shaking, just as Indra severed the head of Vritasura earlier.
FAQs
By comparing Rāma’s act to Indra’s slaying of Vṛtra, the verse frames the fall of the rākṣasa-lord as the defeat of adharma by a rightful protector, reinforcing the idea that force used to restore moral order can be dharmic.
Satya is implied through the epic’s moral causality: the truthful, vow-bound Rāma acts decisively in a just war, and the narrative presents the outcome as consistent with the truthful order of the world—adharma ultimately meets its due end.