Shloka 17
Adhyaya 75 — The Fall and Restoration of Revatī Nakṣatra and the Birth of Raivata Manu
सोऽयं किमात्मदोषेण मम दोषेण वा मुने ।
अस्मद्दुःखवहो जातो दौःशील्याद् बन्धुशोकदः ॥
so 'yaṃ kim ātmadoṣeṇa mama doṣeṇa vā mune /
asmad-duḥkhavaho jāto dauḥśīlyād bandhu-śokadaḥ
हे मुने, हा (पुत्र) त्याच्या दोषाने जन्मला की माझ्या दोषाने—जो आमच्यासाठी शोकाचा भार झाला आहे आणि आपल्या दुष्चरित्राने आमच्या बांधवांना दुःख देणारा ठरला आहे?
{ "primaryRasa": "karuna", "secondaryRasa": "shanta", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
FAQs
The verse articulates a classic dharma-question: moral responsibility vs. inherited/parental causality. It pushes the inquiry beyond ritual correctness into character formation and karmic entanglement.
Ethical-philosophical dialogue (dharma-vicāra), outside pancalakṣaṇa categories.
The ‘fault’ dilemma mirrors the guṇa theory: tamasic tendencies may arise from prior saṃskāras (past impressions), challenging simplistic blame and urging compassionate discernment.