Home›Varaha Purana›Adhyaya 22›Shloka 18
←Previous Verse
Next Verse→

Varaha Purana 22.18: Adhyaya 22, Shloka 18

Gaurī’s Rebirth, Umā’s Austerities, Rudra’s Test, and the Himalayan Wedding

Pūrva Bhāga · Dharma-nyāya (Ethical and juridical discourse)

अन्यव्यतिक्रमे धर्ममपनेतुं च शक्यते । ब्रह्मवध्याः पुनर्नैवमेवमुक्त्वा गता त्वरम् ॥ २२.१८ ॥

Recitation with translationVaraha Purana 22.18

anyavyatikrame dharmam apanetuṃ ca śakyate | brahmavadhyāḥ punarnaivam evam uktvā gatā tvaram || 22.18 ||

മറ്റു അതിക്രമങ്ങളിൽ ധർമ്മാനുസരിച്ച് ദോഷനിവാരണം സാധ്യമാണ്; എന്നാൽ ബ്രഹ്മഹത്യയുടെ കാര്യത്തിൽ അങ്ങനെ അല്ല. ഇങ്ങനെ പറഞ്ഞ് അവൾ വേഗത്തിൽ പുറപ്പെട്ടു।

anya-vyatikramein other transgressions
anya-vyatikrame
TypeNoun
FormMasculine (पुंलिङ्ग), Locative (सप्तमी), Singular (एकवचन); tatpuruṣa: 'in the transgression of another (rule)' (अन्यस्य व्यतिक्रमः)
RoleAdhikarana (अधिकरण)
Rootanya-vyatikrama (अन्य + व्यतिक्रम प्रातिपदिक)
dharmamdharma / law
dharmam
TypeNoun
FormMasculine (पुंलिङ्ग), Accusative (द्वितीया), Singular (एकवचन)
RoleKarma (कर्म)
Rootdharma (प्रातिपदिक)
apanetumto remove / avert
apanetum
TypeVerb
FormKridanta; Infinitive (तुमुनन्त/तुमर्थक), 'to remove'
RolePrayojana (प्रयोजन/उद्देश्य)
Rootapa-√nī (अप + नी धातु) + tumun (तुमुन्)
caand
ca
TypeIndeclinable
FormAvyaya; conjunction (समुच्चय)
RoleSambandha (सम्बन्ध)
Rootca (अव्यय)
śakyateis possible
śakyate
TypeVerb
FormPresent (लट्), Ātmanepada (आत्मनेपद), 3rd person (प्रथमपुरुष), Singular (एकवचन); impersonal/passive sense: 'it is possible'
RoleKriya (क्रिया)
Rootśak (शक् धातु)
brahmavadhyāḥfrom the sin of brahmin-slaying
brahmavadhyāḥ
TypeNoun
FormFeminine (स्त्रीलिङ्ग), Ablative (पञ्चमी), Singular (एकवचन); tatpuruṣa: 'from brahmin-slaying (sin)' (ब्रह्मवध्यायाः)
RoleApadana (अपादान)
Rootbrahma-vadhyā (ब्रह्म + वध्यā प्रातिपदिक)
punaragain / however
punar
TypeIndeclinable
FormAvyaya; adverb (पुनरावृत्तिवाचक)
RoleSambandha (सम्बन्ध/क्रियाविशेषण)
Rootpunar (अव्यय)
nanot
na
TypeIndeclinable
FormAvyaya; negation particle (निषेध)
RoleSambandha (सम्बन्ध/निषेध)
Rootna (अव्यय)
evaindeed / only
eva
TypeIndeclinable
FormAvyaya; emphatic particle (अवधारण)
RoleSambandha (सम्बन्ध/अवधारण)
Rooteva (अव्यय)
evamthus
evam
TypeIndeclinable
FormAvyaya; manner-adverb (प्रकारवाचक)
RoleSambandha (सम्बन्ध/क्रियाविशेषण)
Rootevam (अव्यय)
uktvāhaving said
uktvā
TypeVerb
FormKridanta; Absolutive/Gerund (क्त्वान्त), 'having said'
RolePurvakala (पूर्वकाल/क्रियाविशेषण)
Rootvac (वच् धातु) + ktvā (क्त्वा)
gatāwent
gatā
TypeVerb
FormKridanta (past active participle by usage/क्त); Feminine (स्त्रीलिङ्ग), Nominative (प्रथमा), Singular (एकवचन)
RoleKarta (कर्ता)
Rootgam (गम् धातु) + kta (क्त)
tvaramquickly / in haste
tvaram
TypeNoun
FormFeminine (स्त्रीलिङ्ग), Accusative (द्वितीया), Singular (एकवचन); used adverbially (क्रियाविशेषणवत्)
RoleSambandha (सम्बन्ध/क्रियाविशेषण)
Roottvarā (त्वरा प्रातिपदिक)
  • dharmam apanetuṃ = dharmam + apanetuṃ
  • punarnaivam = punar + na + evam (r-sandhi and vowel sandhi)
  • evamuktvā = evam + uktvā

Bhayanaka and Shanta rasaSetting: Ethical-legal discourse space
Speaker

Pṛthivī

In this verse
Varaha teaches her
Her state of mind

Anxious, didactic, and hurried—pressing the point of inexpiability

What she asks

Which sins admit prāyaścitta, and why is brahma-hatyā uniquely resistant to expiation?

Kind of teaching
Moral psychology of karma
Subjects
EthicsDharmaśāstra discourseSin and expiation (prāyaścitta)
Core idea

Some karmic violations are portrayed as structurally destabilizing to social-sacral order, hence treated as nearly irreversible.

In practice

Prioritize prevention over cure in ethical life; do not rely on ritual expiation as a substitute for restraint and protection.

C
Classical Literature
P
Purāṇic Ethics
S
Sanskrit Philology
D
Dharma Traditions

FAQs

It reflects a common dharma-legal hierarchy found across Sanskrit normative literature, where certain acts are framed as more difficult (or impossible) to expiate, illustrating how Purāṇic texts transmit and popularize ethical-juridical categories.

No geographic location is named in this verse fragment; the content is ethical-juridical rather than topographical.

The verse distinguishes between expiable transgressions and the especially grave category of brahma-hatyā, presenting a hierarchy of wrongdoing and stressing the exceptional seriousness attributed to that act in the dharma tradition.

Ask anything about this verse

Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.

Not sure where to start?

A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.

Read Varaha Purana in the Vedapath app

Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with word-by-word meanings, Sanskrit recitation where available, and more.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Continue reading in the Vedapath app

Open in App
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play