Shloka 19
Adhyaya 70 — The King Confronts the Rakshasa and Restores the Brahmin’s Wife
सन्ति नः प्रमदा भूप ! रूपेणाप्सरसां समाः ।
राक्षस्यस्तासु तिष्ठत्सु मानुषीषु रतिः कथम् ॥
santi naḥ pramadā bhūpa rūpeṇāpsarasāṃ samāḥ | rākṣasyas tāsu tiṣṭhatsu mānuṣīṣu ratiḥ katham ||
ഹേ രാജാവേ, ഞങ്ങളിടയിൽ അപ്സരസ്സുകളുടെ തുല്യമായ സൗന്ദര്യമുള്ള രാക്ഷസീ സ്ത്രീകൾ ഉണ്ട്. അത്തരം രാക്ഷസീകൾ ലഭ്യമായിരിക്കെ മനുഷ്യസ്ത്രീകളോടു മോഹം എങ്ങനെ ഉണ്ടാകും?
{ "primaryRasa": "adbhuta", "secondaryRasa": "shanta", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
FAQs
The rākṣasa uses plausibility to deny wrongdoing. The ethical point is to scrutinize persuasive speech: dharma is not established by clever argument but by conduct and consequences.
Narrative-ethical material (upākhyāna), not directly tied to sarga/pratisarga/manvantara/vaṃśa.
Apsaras-like beauty stands for refined temptation; the claim ‘no desire for humans’ masks a deeper motive—removing the wife to disable yajña—showing how kāma can be a cover for power-strategy.