Agni Purana — Sahitya-shastra, Shloka 33
Discrimination of the Qualities of Poetry (Kāvya-guṇa-viveka) — Closing Verse/Colophon Transition
कियन्त एव वा येन सामान्यस्तेन सद्विधा छेदसिद्धन्ततो ऽन्यः स्यात् केषाञ्चिद्भ्रान्तितो यथा
kiyanta eva vā yena sāmānyastena sadvidhā chedasiddhantato 'nyaḥ syāt keṣāñcidbhrāntito yathā
ຫຼືຈະກ່າວໃຫ້ຖືກຕ້ອງກວ່ານັ້ນ “ສາມັນ/ສາກົນ” (sāmānya) ຖືກຕັ້ງຂຶ້ນເທົ່າທີ່ມັນຊ່ວຍໃຫ້ການສ້າງຕັ້ງເປັນຫຼັກໄດ້; ບໍ່ຊັ້ນ ຕາມທິດສະດີ “ເຊດະ-ສິດທານຕະ” (ການແບ່ງວິເຄາະ) ອາດໄດ້ຂໍ້ສະຫຼຸບອື່ນ—ເຫມືອນຄວາມຫຼົງຜິດ (bhrānti) ຂອງບາງຄົນ।
Lord Agni (teaching the sage Vasiṣṭha in an encyclopedic, śāstra-style exposition)
Vidya Category: {"primary_vidya":"Philosophy","secondary_vidya":"Vyakarana","practical_application":"In defining universals (sāmānya), limit the scope to what is actually established by valid grounds; avoid overextension that leads to alternative partitions (cheda) or mere error (bhrānti).","sutra_style":true}
Encyclopedic Reference: {"reference_type":"Commentary","entry_title":"Limits of Sāmānya: Establishment, Cheda-siddhānta, and Bhrānti","lookup_keywords":["sāmānya","cheda-siddhānta","bhrānti","establishment","padārtha"],"quick_summary":"A universal is posited only to the extent it is established; otherwise analytical division can yield different 'universals', and some positions may be mere error."}
Concept: Epistemic restraint: universals are theory-constructs bounded by pramāṇa-based establishment; unchecked 'cheda' (over-partitioning) and bhrānti (error) distort ontology.
Application: When classifying entities (in logic, grammar, or poetics), state the pramāṇa/criterion for the class; test whether alternative partitions explain data better or merely multiply abstractions.
Khanda Section: Nyaya–Vaisheshika / Padartha-viveka (Logic and Epistemology)
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: bibhatsa
Visual Art Cues: {"scene_description":"A teacher draws circles and partitions on a board/palm-leaf diagram to show how different 'cuts' (cheda) create different groupings, warning students about mistaking error for universals.","kerala_mural_prompt":"Kerala mural, guru with stylus indicating partitioned diagrams on palm-leaf, students attentive, subdued palette, emphasis on clear geometric groupings and a cautionary gesture","tanjore_prompt":"Tanjore painting, gold-highlighted diagram tablet, guru seated with authoritative posture, students holding palm-leaves, visual contrast between 'established' grouping and 'bhrānti' grouping","mysore_prompt":"Mysore style, crisp instructional chart: one established sāmānya vs multiple cheda-based alternatives, annotations in Devanagari, clean lines and pedagogic clarity","mughal_miniature_prompt":"Mughal miniature, madrasa-like setting, scholar demonstrating classification with ink diagrams, students debating, fine detail in writing instruments and paper textures"}
Audio Atmosphere: {"recitation_mood":"contemplative","suggested_raga":"Bhairav","pace":"medium","voice_tone":"instructional"}
Sandhi Resolution Notes: sāmānyastena → sāmānyaḥ + tena; siddhantato 'nyaḥ → siddhāntataḥ + anyaḥ; keṣāñcidbhrāntito → keṣāñcit + bhrāntitaḥ.
Related Themes: Agni Purana 346 (Padārtha-viveka / sāmānya-viśeṣa discussion)
FAQs
It imparts epistemic method: a universal (sāmānya) should be accepted only to the extent warranted by its proof; otherwise, excessive analytical splitting (cheda-siddhānta) can generate divergent theses, akin to conclusions born of error (bhrānti).
Beyond rites and myths, the Agni Purana also preserves śāstric reasoning—here, technical Nyāya/ Vaiśeṣika-style reflection on universals, valid grounds of inference, and how mistaken cognition produces competing doctrines.
It encourages disciplined discernment (viveka): accepting only what is properly established and avoiding delusion-driven views, which supports right understanding (samyag-jñāna) and steadier dharmic conduct.