Dietary Rules & Purification — Dietary Rules, Purification (Śauca), and the Duties of the Householder and Forest-Dweller
अभोज्याः सूतिकाषण्ढमार्जाराखुश्वकुक्कुटाः पतितापविद्धनग्नाश्चाण्डालाद्यधमाश्च ये
abhojyāḥ sūtikāṣaṇḍhamārjārākhuśvakukkuṭāḥ patitāpaviddhanagnāścāṇḍālādyadhamāśca ye
អ្នកដែលមិនគួរទទួលអាហារពីពួកគេ (អភោជ្យ) មានដូចជា ស្ត្រីក្រោយសម្រាលកូន អ្នកខ្វះសមត្ថភាពជាបុរស (ṣaṇḍha) ហើយក៏មានឆ្មា កណ្ដុរ ឆ្កែ និងមាន់; ដូចគ្នានេះ អ្នកធ្លាក់ចុះ អ្នកត្រូវបណ្តេញ/កខ្វក់ អ្នកអាក្រាត និងមនុស្សទាបៗ ចាប់ពីចណ្ឌាលា ជាដើម។
{ "primaryRasa": "bibhatsa", "secondaryRasa": "bhayanaka", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
The verse encodes a traditional purity regime: food is treated as a carrier of social and ritual influence. Ethically, it reflects an ideal of guarding one’s sāttvika discipline through regulated intake; historically, it also preserves boundaries that later readers may find socially exclusionary.
It is ancillary dharma/ācāra material embedded in a purāṇic chapter (not a core pancalakṣaṇa item like vaṃśa or manvantara). Such lists commonly appear in tīrtha-māhātmya sections to standardize conduct for pilgrims.
‘Abhojya’ operates symbolically as a warning about assimilating qualities through consumption and companionship. The animal list (cat/rat/dog/cock) signals scavenging/impurity associations in classical Indian codes, while the human categories mark perceived disruptions to ritual order.