Bharata’s Attachment and the Palanquin Teaching on ‘I’ and ‘Mine’
एवं व्यवस्थिते तत्त्वे मयाहमिति भावितुम् । पृथकूचरणनिष्पाद्यं शक्यं तु नृपते कथम् ॥ ९५ ॥
evaṃ vyavasthite tattve mayāhamiti bhāvitum | pṛthakūcaraṇaniṣpādyaṃ śakyaṃ tu nṛpate katham || 95 ||
ពេលតត្តវៈ—សច្ចធម៌—ត្រូវបានបញ្ជាក់ដូចនេះហើយ ឱ ព្រះមហាក្សត្រ តើអាចរក្សាគំនិត «ខ្ញុំ» និង «របស់ខ្ញុំ» ដោយគិតថា ត្រូវបង្កើត និងទ្រទ្រង់ដោយការខិតខំផ្ទាល់ខ្លួនដាច់ដោយឡែក បានដូចម្តេច?
Sanatkumara (teaching a king in Moksha-dharma dialogue)
Vrata: none
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: none
It points out that once tattva (ultimate Reality) is rightly understood, the ego-notion of “I” and “mine” cannot be legitimately sustained; liberation follows from seeing that separateness is not ultimately real.
By undermining “mine-ness,” it supports surrender (śaraṇāgati): devotion matures when one stops claiming independent doership and possessiveness, offering the self and actions to the Supreme.
No specific Vedanga (like Vyākaraṇa, Jyotiṣa, or Kalpa) is taught here; the practical takeaway is inner discipline—reducing ahamkāra and mamakāra through discernment (viveka) and detachment (vairāgya).