Dialogue on the Ethical Limits of Subsistence and the Five Great Sacrifices
Dharmavyādha, Mātaṅga, and Prasanna
त्वं तु जीवान् बहून् हत्वा स्वकुटुम्बेन सानुगः । भुञ्जन्नेतेन सततमभो्ज्यं तन्मतं मम ॥ ८.२८ ॥
tvaṁ tu jīvān bahūn hatvā svakuṭumbena sānugaḥ | bhuñjann etena satatam abhojyaṁ tan-mataṁ mama || 8.28 ||
「しかし汝は—多くの生きものを殺し—己が家族と従者と共に、その手段で得た食を常に食している。われの見解では、それは食すべからざるものだ。」
Varāha (default dialogic instructor framework)
Varaha Avatara Context: {"is_varaha_focus":false}
Bhu Devi Dialogue: {"is_dialogue":false,"speaker_role":"instructor"}
Mathura Mandala: {"is_mathura_related":false}
Dharma Shastra: {"has_dharma_rule":true,"topic":"prayaschitta","instruction_summary":"Continual eating based on killing many beings (especially for household indulgence) is declared abhojya (unfit), implying the need to desist and atone.","karmic_consequence":"Persistent multi-hiṃsā leads to accruing pāpa and loss of ritual purity; restraint and correction restore eligibility for dharmic eating."}
Vrata Mahatmya: {"has_vrata":false}
Cosmic Boar Symbolism: {"has_symbolism":false}
Philosophical Teaching: {"has_teaching":true,"teaching_type":"ethics (ahiṃsā)","core_concept":"Quantity and habit matter: normalized violence as a food-system corrupts dharma; ‘family’ does not justify systemic harm.","practical_application":"Reduce harm in diet, avoid habitual killing-based consumption, shift to plant-based or minimally harmful sustenance where possible."}
Subject Matter: ["Ethics","Dharma (conduct norms)","Non-violence and food ethics"]
Primary Rasa: raudra
Secondary Rasa: bībhatsa
Type: ethical domain (ācāra)
Related Themes: 8.8.27 (limited necessity case); 8.8.29 (plants as intended food)
Visual Art Cues: {"scene_description":"Varāha delivers a stern admonition to a householder figure, contrasting restrained necessity with excessive killing; the ‘abhojya’ judgment is the visual climax.","item_prompts":["Varāha with raised instructive hand","householder with lowered gaze","shadowy suggestion of many slain beings (symbolic)","food plate set aside (refusal)"],"kerala_mural_prompt":"Kerala mural: dramatic teaching gesture, strong facial expressions, symbolic motifs of excess (multiple animal silhouettes) kept non-gory, moral intensity.","tanjore_prompt":"Tanjore: frontal Varāha as judge of dharma, gold aura; subdued figure of offender; plate marked as ‘unaccepted’ by gesture.","mysore_prompt":"Mysore: controlled drama, expressive eyes, refined admonition scene, emphasis on gesture and posture over violence.","pahari_prompt":"Pahari: compact moral tableau, Varāha’s sternness balanced with lyrical restraint, symbolic rather than explicit harm."}
Audio Atmosphere: {"recitation_mood":"stern, corrective","suggested_raga":"Bhairav","pace":"medium-fast","voice_tone":"firm, admonitory"}
It reflects Purāṇic-era ethical discourse on the moral status of food acquisition and consumption, aligning personal conduct (ācāra) with broader dharma norms in classical Sanskrit literature.
No geographic location is named in this verse; it is a general ethical statement rather than a tīrtha (sacred site) description.
Food obtained through killing many living beings is characterized as ethically/ritually improper to consume, especially when done habitually and normalized within one’s household.
A free Google sign-in keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Varaha Purana in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with audio, word-by-word meanings, and more.