Dharmāṅgada’s Conquest of the Directions
यथा दारुमयी योषा चेष्टते कुहकेच्छया । तथाहि पितृवीर्येण पुत्रास्तेजोबलान्विताः ॥ ३० ॥
yathā dārumayī yoṣā ceṣṭate kuhakecchayā | tathāhi pitṛvīryeṇa putrāstejobalānvitāḥ || 30 ||
木で作られた女形(おんながた)が手品師の意のままに動くように、まさにそのとおり、光輝と力を備えた子らも、父の種子の威力によって働くのである。
Narada (narrative voice within the Uttara-Bhaga discourse)
Vrata: none
Rasa: {"primary_rasa":"shanta","secondary_rasa":"adbhuta","emotional_journey":"Employs a striking magical metaphor (wooden puppet moved by a conjurer) to reframe sons’ power as derivative of paternal potency, ending in a sobering, depersonalizing insight."}
It uses a simile to highlight dependent agency: as an inert wooden figure appears to act only through an external controller, progeny are said to manifest vigor through the causal potency of the father—pointing to how visible effects rely on underlying causes.
Indirectly, it supports a bhakti worldview by emphasizing dependence: just as effects rely on causes, the soul’s capacities and outcomes are ultimately dependent, encouraging humility and reliance on the higher source rather than ego-driven doership.
No specific Vedanga (like Vyākaraṇa or Jyotiṣa) is taught directly; the verse instead employs a nyāya-style analogy (illustrative reasoning) common in śāstric exposition to clarify causality and agency.