Shloka 17
Adhyaya 75 — The Fall and Restoration of Revatī Nakṣatra and the Birth of Raivata Manu
सोऽयं किमात्मदोषेण मम दोषेण वा मुने ।
अस्मद्दुःखवहो जातो दौःशील्याद् बन्धुशोकदः ॥
so 'yaṃ kim ātmadoṣeṇa mama doṣeṇa vā mune /
asmad-duḥkhavaho jāto dauḥśīlyād bandhu-śokadaḥ
それゆえ、聖者よ、この子の出生は彼自身の過失によるのか、それとも私の過失によるのか。彼は我らに悲嘆をもたらし、悪しき行いによって親族にも苦しみを与える者となった。
{ "primaryRasa": "karuna", "secondaryRasa": "shanta", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
FAQs
The verse articulates a classic dharma-question: moral responsibility vs. inherited/parental causality. It pushes the inquiry beyond ritual correctness into character formation and karmic entanglement.
Ethical-philosophical dialogue (dharma-vicāra), outside pancalakṣaṇa categories.
The ‘fault’ dilemma mirrors the guṇa theory: tamasic tendencies may arise from prior saṃskāras (past impressions), challenging simplistic blame and urging compassionate discernment.