Vasiṣṭha on Saṃsāra, Guṇas, and Misattributed Agency
Mahābhārata 12.292
विश्वामित्रस्य पुत्रत्वमृचीकतनयो5गमत् | ऋग्भि: स्तुत्वा महाबाहो देवान् वै यज्ञभागिन:,महाबाहो! ऋचीकके पुत्र यज्ञमें भाग लेनेवाले देवताओंकी वेदमन्त्रोंद्वारा स्तुति करके विश्वामित्रके पुत्र हो गये
Viśvāmitrasya putratvam ṛcīkatanayo ’gamat | ṛgbhiḥ stutvā mahābāho devān vai yajñabhāginaḥ ||
パラーシャラは言った。「大臂の者よ、リーチーカ(Ṛcīka)の子は、ヴィシュヴァーミトラ(Viśvāmitra)の子としての位を得た。供犠において分け前を受ける神々を、リグ・ヴェーダの讃歌によって讃嘆したゆえに、彼は(そのように数えられて)ヴィシュヴァーミトラの子となった。」
पराशर उवाच
The verse highlights the ethical-religious idea that rightful ritual action—praising the gods with Vedic hymns and honoring sacrificial order—can confer recognized status and affiliation (here, ‘sonship’), showing how merit and dharmic conduct shape social and genealogical identity.
Parāśara states that Ṛcīka’s son attained the status of being Viśvāmitra’s son after praising the gods who receive sacrificial shares with Ṛgvedic hymns, indicating a transformation or recognition of lineage through ritual praise.