Shloka 15
च्यवन-कुशिक-संवादः
Cyavana–Kuśika Dialogue on Hospitality, Service, and Lineage Questions
भीष्म उवाच आत्मजं पुत्रमुत्पाद्य यस्त्यजेत् कारणान्तरे । न तत्र कारणं रेत: स क्षेत्रस्वामिनो भवेत्
bhīṣma uvāca | ātmajaṃ putram utpādya yas tyajet kāraṇāntare | na tatra kāraṇaṃ retaḥ sa kṣetrasvāmino bhavet |
ビーシュマは言った。「わが子よ、ある男が自らの種で子をもうけながら、別の理由でその子を捨てるなら、ただ精を置いたというだけでは、その子に対する権利の根拠とはならぬ。その場合、子は『田の主』（クシェートラ）—すなわち家と血統の責任を法として負う者—に属すると見なされる。」
भीष्म उवाच
Educational Q&A
Paternity and rights over a child are not grounded merely in biological seed; they are tied to dharmic responsibility. If a begetter abandons the child, the child is deemed to belong to the lawful ‘owner of the field’ (kṣetra)—the person who holds the legitimate social and moral claim and bears the duty of care and lineage.
Bhishma is instructing on dharma concerning offspring and legitimacy. He states a rule-like principle: when a man fathers a child but then relinquishes him for other reasons, he cannot claim the child solely on the basis of having provided semen; the child’s affiliation shifts to the kṣetrasvāmin, the lawful holder of the procreative ‘field’ and household responsibility.