Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 57

Indrajit’s Binding, Restoration by Viśalyā, and Counsel Restraining Rāvaṇa (Āraṇyaka Parva 273)

दैत्येन्द्रस्य सभां गत्वा पार्णिं संस्पृश्य पाणिना । दैत्यानामादिपुरुष: सुरारिरदितिनन्दन:

daityendrasya sabhāṁ gatvā pārṇiṁ saṁspṛśya pāṇinā | daityānām ādipuruṣaḥ surārīr aditinandanaḥ ||

Bhīmasena said: “Having gone to the assembly-hall of the lord of the Daityas, and touching the bow with his hand, the primeval progenitor of the Daityas—enemy of the gods, the son who brought joy to Aditi—(stood/was present).”

दैत्येन्द्रस्यof the lord of the Daityas
दैत्येन्द्रस्य:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootदैत्येन्द्र
FormMasculine, Genitive, Singular
सभाम्assembly hall
सभाम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootसभा
FormFeminine, Accusative, Singular
गत्वाhaving gone
गत्वा:
TypeVerb
Rootगम्
FormAbsolutive (Gerund)
पार्णिम्Pārṇi (a proper name)
पार्णिम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootपार्णि
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular
संस्पृश्यhaving touched
संस्पृश्य:
TypeVerb
Rootसम् + स्पृश्
FormAbsolutive (Gerund)
पाणिनाwith (his) hand
पाणिना:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootपाणि
FormMasculine, Instrumental, Singular
दैत्यानाम्of the Daityas
दैत्यानाम्:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootदैत्य
FormMasculine, Genitive, Plural
आदि-पुरुषःthe primeval person / first progenitor
आदि-पुरुषः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootआदिपुरुष
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
सुर-अरिःenemy of the gods
सुर-अरिः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootसुरारि
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
अदिति-नन्दनःson of Aditi
अदिति-नन्दनः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootअदितिनन्दन
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular

भीमसेन उवाच

B
Bhīmasena
D
Daityendra (lord of the Daityas)
D
Daityas
D
Devas (Suras)
A
Aditi
S
Sabhā (assembly-hall)
P
Pārṇi (bow)

Educational Q&A

The verse frames power in moral terms by identifying a figure through relational epithets—‘enemy of the gods’ and ‘Aditi’s son’—reminding the reader that actions and alliances define ethical standing, not merely status or might.

Bhīma describes a scene in which someone enters the Daitya-lord’s court and touches a bow, while the verse characterizes a prominent Daitya figure through traditional epithets, situating the moment within the broader Deva–Daitya antagonism.