Shloka 95
कथं महात्मा गाजड़ेय: सर्वशस्त्रभृतां वर: । कालकर्ता नरव्याघ्र: सम्प्राप्ते दक्षिणायने,महात्मा गंगानन्दन भीष्म सम्पूर्ण शस्त्रधारियोंमें श्रेष्ठ, मनुष्योंमें सिंहके समान पराक्रमी तथा कालपर भी प्रभुत्व रखनेवाले थे। इन्होंने दक्षिणायनमें मृत्यु क्यों स्वीकार की?
kathaṃ mahātmā gāṅgeyaḥ sarvaśastrabhṛtāṃ varaḥ | kālakartā naravyāghraḥ samprāpte dakṣiṇāyane ||
Sañjaya said: “How did the great-souled Bhīṣma, the son of the Gaṅgā—foremost among all who bear weapons, a tiger among men, and one who could determine the very time of his death—come to accept death when the sun had entered the southern course (Dakṣiṇāyana)? Why would such a master of self and destiny choose to depart at that season?”
संजय उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse foregrounds the ethical and spiritual problem of death’s timing: even one who can choose the moment of death (kālakartā) is still interpreted through dharma and cosmic order (the sun’s course). It invites reflection on how personal agency, vows, and the auspiciousness of time interact in a dharmic worldview.
Sañjaya, narrating events to Dhṛtarāṣṭra, expresses wonder: Bhīṣma—renowned as the greatest warrior and as one who could control the time of his death—has accepted death in Dakṣiṇāyana. The question sets up an explanation of Bhīṣma’s choice and the significance of seasonal/solar timing in his passing.