Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 25

ययाति–शक्रसंवादः

Speech-Ethics and Forbearance in the Celestial Court

स समागम्य शर्मिष्ठां यथाकाममवाप्य च | अन्योन्यं चाभिसम्पूज्य जग्मतुस्तीौ यथागतम्‌,फिर शर्मिष्ठाके साथ समागम किया और इच्छानुसार कामोपभोग करके एक-दूसरेका आदर-सत्कार करनेके पश्चात्‌ दोनों जैसे आये थे वैसे ही अपने-अपने स्थानपर चले गये

sa samāgamya śarmiṣṭhāṃ yathākāmam avāpya ca | anyonyaṃ cābhisampūjya jagmatus tau yathāgatam ||

Vaiśampāyana said: He met with Śarmiṣṭhā, and, having enjoyed intimacy according to desire, the two then honored one another with due regard; thereafter they departed, each returning just as they had come. The verse narrates a private act followed by mutual courtesy, hinting at the tension between personal desire (kāma) and the social-ethical consequences that such secret encounters can entail in the larger story.

सःhe
सः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootतद्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
समागम्यhaving met/approached
समागम्य:
TypeVerb
Rootसम्-आ-गम्
Formल्यप् (absolutive/gerund), Parasmaipada (usage), prior action
शर्मिष्ठाम्Śarmiṣṭhā
शर्मिष्ठाम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootशर्मिष्ठा
FormFeminine, Accusative, Singular
यथाकामम्as desired; according to wish
यथाकामम्:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootयथा + काम
अवाप्यhaving obtained/attained
अवाप्य:
TypeVerb
Rootअव्-आप्
Formल्यप् (absolutive/gerund), Parasmaipada (usage), prior action
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
अन्योन्यम्each other; mutually
अन्योन्यम्:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootअन्योन्य
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
अभिसम्पूज्यhaving duly honored/worshipped
अभिसम्पूज्य:
TypeVerb
Rootअभि-सम्-पूज्
Formल्यप् (absolutive/gerund), Parasmaipada (usage), prior action
जग्मतुःthe two went
जग्मतुः:
TypeVerb
Rootगम्
Formलिट् (perfect), Third, Dual, Parasmaipada
तौthose two
तौ:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootतद्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Dual
यथागतम्as they had come; in the same manner as before
यथागतम्:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootयथा + आगत

वैशम्पायन उवाच

V
Vaiśampāyana
Ś
Śarmiṣṭhā

Educational Q&A

The verse juxtaposes desire (kāma) with decorum (mutual honoring). It suggests that even when actions are driven by private desire, social forms of respect are maintained—yet the broader narrative warns that such desire-led acts can carry serious ethical and familial consequences.

A man meets Śarmiṣṭhā, they engage in intimacy as desired, then they exchange mutual respect and depart separately, returning as they had come.