Garuḍa’s Breach of the Amṛta-Guard and Boons with Viṣṇu; Encounter with Indra (Ādi-parva, Adhyāya 29)
विभागं कीर्तयत्येव सुप्रतीको हि नित्यश: । अथाब्रवीच्च त॑ भ्राता सुप्रतीक॑ विभावसु:,सुप्रतीक प्रतिदिन बँटवारेके लिये आग्रह करते ही रहते थे। तब एक दिन बड़े भाई विभावसुने सुप्रतीकसे कहा--
vibhāgaṃ kīrtayaty eva supratīko hi nityaśaḥ | athābravīc ca taṃ bhrātā vibhāvasuḥ supratīkam ||
Supratīka kept insisting, day after day, on a formal division of shares. Then, on one such day, his elder brother Vibhāvasu addressed Supratīka—setting the stage for a conversation about rightful allotment, restraint, and the ethics of demanding one’s due.
कश्यप उवाच
Repeated insistence on one’s share (vibhāga) can become ethically charged: dharma requires that claims be pursued with restraint, clarity, and regard for familial harmony. The verse frames a moral situation where speech and counsel are needed to prevent a dispute from hardening into conflict.
Supratīka continually presses for a division of shares. In response, his elder brother Vibhāvasu finally speaks to him, marking the beginning of an admonition or negotiation about how the division should be handled.