Bhīṣma’s Counsel on Reconciliation and Partition (भीष्मोपदेशः—संधि-राज्यविभागविचारः)
यथायं विहितो धर्मो यतश्चायं सनातन: । यथा च प्राह कौन्तेयस्तथा धर्मो न संशय:
yathāyaṁ vihito dharmo yataścāyaṁ sanātanaḥ | yathā ca prāha kaunteyastathā dharmo na saṁśayaḥ ||
Sebagaimana dharma ini telah ditetapkan dengan semestinya, dan karena ia selaras dengan tatanan yang kekal, serta sebagaimana putra Kuntī telah mengemukakannya—demikianlah, tanpa ragu, itulah dharma.
व्यास उवाच
That an action is to be accepted as dharma when it is both scripturally/authoritatively enjoined (vihita) and consistent with the eternal moral order (sanātana), and when sound reasoning by a competent authority (here, Kaunteya) supports it—hence it is ‘without doubt’ dharma.
Vyāsa delivers a concluding validation: he affirms that the disputed practice—contextually, the propriety of a particular marriage arrangement—fits established injunctions and the eternal dharma, and that Yudhiṣṭhira’s defense of its dharma-compatibility is correct.