Nārāyaṇa as the Sacrificial Principle, Analysis of the Three Guṇas, and the Account of Delusion-Doctrines
यद्धीनं रजसा कर्म केवलं तामसं तु यत् । तद् दुर्गतिपरं नॄणामिह लोके परत्र च ॥ ७०.२३ ॥
yaddhīnaṃ rajasā karma kevalaṃ tāmasaṃ tu yat | tad durgatiparaṃ nṝṇām iha loke paratra ca || 70.23 ||
जो काम रजस से कम हो, या सिर्फ तामसिक हो, वो गलत रास्ते पे ले जाता है। इस दुनिया में भी दुख देता है, मरने के बाद भी।
Varāha (default, instructor voice in Varāha–Pṛthivī dialogue framework)
It reflects a Purāṇic synthesis of ethical teaching with guṇa-theory (sattva–rajas–tamas), a conceptual framework widely shared with Sāṃkhya and later Dharma-śāstra discussions on evaluating human action.
No geographic location is named in this verse; it is a general ethical-philosophical statement about action and its consequences.
Actions characterized by deficiency in rajas (productive engagement) or dominated by tamas (inertia/delusion) are presented as leading to adverse outcomes for humans, affecting both present life and post-mortem consequence frameworks.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.