The Observance for the Fulfilment of Desires: Worship of Keśava in the Form of Guha
Kumāra
Pūrva Bhāga · Nāma-smaraṇa / Devatā-nāma-paryāya (thematic listing of divine epithets)
षड्वक्त्र कार्त्तिक गुह सेनानी कृत्तिकासुत । कुमार स्कन्द इत्येवं पूज्यो विष्णुः स्वनामभिः ॥ ६१.६ ॥
ṣaḍvaktra kārttika guha senānī kṛttikāsuta | kumāra skanda ityevaṁ pūjyo viṣṇuḥ svanāmabhiḥ || 61.6 ||
ShaDvaktra kArttika guha senAnI kRRittikAsuta | kumAra skanda ityevaM pUjyo viShNuH svanAmabhiH || 61.6 ||
विष्णु भगवान को इन सब नाम से बुलाना है, छह मुख वाला, कार्तिक, गुह, सेनापति, कृत्तिका का बेटा, कुमार, स्कंद। यह सब उनके ही नाम हैं।
Varāha
Recitation of authoritative divine epithets is itself a complete mode of worship; many names can converge on one deity.
In vrata practice, include structured nāma-japa/archana using the specified epithets with attention and correct pronunciation.
Doctrinal instruction: Varāha teaches name-recitation as worship.
The verse models Purāṇic theism where divine functions/names are harmonized: Viṣṇu as the underlying deity receiving multiple functional epithets—suggesting one Brahman appearing as many devatā-roles.
Nāma as mantra-body: the ‘many names’ function like multiple oblations offered into one fire—unity of recipient despite plurality of offerings.
Supports ekatva (oneness) behind nāma-rūpa plurality: saguna worship through diverse epithets points to a single supreme reality.
Honor Viṣṇu by reciting and worshipping through these recognized epithets: Ṣaḍvaktra, Kārttika, Guha, Senānī, Kṛttikāsuta, Kumāra, Skanda.
Correct nāma-pūjā is implied to secure the vrata’s fruit; careless or incorrect invocation weakens the intended devotional/ritual effect.
Implied protection, victory, and fulfillment associated with Senānī/Skanda epithets, integrated into Vaiṣṇava merit.
Indirect: Vaiṣṇava framework; however the epithets listed are Skanda/Guha-related names applied here to Viṣṇu in a syncretic/identificatory mode.
Varāha Purāṇa 61.61.5 (Guharūpa Keśava worship); Varāha Purāṇa 61.61.7 (vrata conclusion rites)
It illustrates a Purāṇic devotional technique—honoring a deity through established epithets—reflecting how Sanskrit texts preserve and systematize divine name-lists (nāma-paryāyas) for liturgical and mnemonic use.
No specific geographic site is named in this verse; it focuses on epithets and ritual honoring through name-recitation.
The verse emphasizes disciplined remembrance and respectful speech as a form of practice: honoring through accurate naming (a linguistic-ritual discipline rather than a coercive command).
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.