The Disruption of Dakṣa’s Sacrifice, the Hari-Hara Conflict, and the Establishment of Rudra’s Sacrificial Share
Pūrva Bhāga · Pr̥thivī-uddhāra and Iconographic Description (Narrative Passage)
एकं गदां भ्रामयति द्वितीयं दण्डमेव च । एकं शोभति कण्ठस्थैर्मणिभिस्त्वस्थिभिः परम् । एकं पीताम्बरं तत्र द्वितीयं सर्पमेखलम् ॥ २१.५६ ॥
ekaṁ gadāṁ bhrāmayati dvitīyaṁ daṇḍam eva ca | ekaṁ śobhati kaṇṭhasthair maṇibhis tv asthibhiḥ param | ekaṁ pītāmbaraṁ tatra dvitīyaṁ sarpamekhalam || 21.56 ||
ekaM gadAM bhrAmayati dvitIyaM daNDameva cha | ekaM shobhati kaNThasthairmaNibhistvasthibhiH param | ekaM pItAmbaraM tatra dvitIyaM sarpamekhalam || 21.56 ||
एक रूप गदा घुमा रहा है, दूसरा सिर्फ डंडा पकड़ा है। एक के गल में मणि चमक रही है और हड्डियाँ भी साफ दिख रही हैं। एक ने पीला कपड़ा पहना है, दूसरे ने साँप की कमरबंद बाँधी है।
Varāha
Adornment with jewels vs bones, yellow silk vs serpent-girdle: prosperity and cremation-ground austerity are presented as two faces of the divine, both within cosmic order.
See ‘śubha’ and ‘ugra’ experiences as complementary; cultivate equanimity amid wealth/beauty and loss/impermanence.
21.21.54-55 (continuing attribute-catalogue)
The verse preserves a stylized, comparative description of attributes (weapons, ornaments, garments) that can be used in manuscript studies and art-history research to trace Purāṇic iconographic conventions and their later reception in temple imagery.
No geographic location is named in this verse fragment; it is primarily descriptive (iconographic/attribute-focused) rather than topographical.
No explicit ethical injunction is stated here; the passage functions as descriptive narration, emphasizing recognizable attributes and symbolic markers rather than prescribing conduct.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.