Expiation and Dietary Discipline Concerning the Consumption of Royal Food
rājānna
Pūrva Bhāga · Dharma-śāstric Ethics (Inquiry into royal fault)
धरण्युवाच ॥ शृणु तत्त्वेन मे देव हृदये हि व्यवस्थितम् ॥ को नु दोषोऽस्ति राज्ञां हि तन्मे त्वं वक्तुमर्हसि ॥
dharaṇy uvāca | śṛṇu tattvena me deva hṛdaye hi vyavasthitam | ko nu doṣo 'sti rājñāṃ hi tan me tvaṃ vaktum arhasi ||
dharaNyuvAcha || shRRiNu tattvena me deva hRRidaye hi vyavasthitam || ko nu doSho.asti rAj~nAM hi tanme tvaM vaktumarhasi
धरती ने कहा, देव, मेरी बात सच-सच सुनो जो मेरा दिल मानता है। राजा लोगों में क्या दोष है? आप मुझे बताइए।
Pṛthivī / Dharaṇī (Earth)
Curious, concerned, seeking clarity (dharma-jijñāsā)
What is the fault (doṣa) of kings/royal agency that makes rājānna blameworthy?
Ethics requires discerning causes (doṣa) rather than merely fearing outcomes; inquiry is itself a dharmic act.
Before accepting patronage/power-linked benefits, examine the moral quality of the source and the systemic harms involved.
Bhū-devī directly petitions the Lord to clarify the ethical fault connected with kings/royalty
Requests a rājadharma/ethical analysis: identify the doṣa inherent in kings (or in dependence on them) that taints royal food/benefit.
Clarification sought to prevent adharma and its punishments; implied that misunderstanding leads to grave karmic harm.
Varāha Purāṇa 130.8.0–130.9.0 (rājānna and naraka); Varāha Purāṇa 130.13.0 (Nārāyaṇa begins reply)
It echoes classical debates on rājadharma (ethics of rulership) by asking whether political authority inherently entails moral fault.
No location is specified; the verse is a conceptual question about governance.
Moral critique should be precise: identify the specific ‘fault’ rather than condemning broadly.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.