Ramcharitmanas: Ayodhya Kanda, Prakarana 3
छंद 25
यह सोपान ‘धर्म-राज्य’ के द्वार पर ‘मोह-राज्य’ की परीक्षा है: जहाँ रामराज्य का उत्सव (सगुण-लीला) भीतर ही भीतर काम–क्रोध–कपट की आँधी से टकराता है। साधक के लिए यह चरण बताता है कि मुक्ति का मार्ग केवल बाह्य शुभ-घटना नहीं, बल्कि मन के ‘कोपभवन’ में उठती वासनाओं का विवेकपूर्वक निराकरण है।
केहि हेतु रानि रिसानि परसत पानि पतिहि नेवारई।मानहुँ सरोष भुअंग भामिनि बिषम भाँति निहारई।।
दोउ बासना रसना दसन बर मरम ठाहरु देखई।तुलसी नृपति भवतब्यता बस काम कौतुक लेखई।।
kehi hetu rāni risāni parasata pāni patihi nevāraī |mānahũ saroṣa bhuaṁga bhāmini biṣama bhā̃ti nihāraī ||
dou bāsanā rasanā dasana bara marama ṭhāharu dekhaī |tulasī nṛpati bhavatabyatā basa kāma kautuka lekhaī ||
उन्होने रानी से पूछा, रानी, आप किसी बात से गुस्से में क्यों हैं, और हाथ से उसको छुआ। लेकिन उसने अपने पति को धक्का दे दिया। फिर उसने बहुत डरावनी नजर से देखा, जैसे गुस्से वाली नागिन हो। उसके दो इरादे थे, जैसे मुह में दो जीभ। और जो दो वरदान उसने मांगे थे, वो जैसे तेज दांत। वो ढूंढ रही थी कि कहां चोट मारे। तुलसी कहते हैं कि राजा भाग्य के वश में था, इसलिए सब कुछ एक खेल समझ रहा था, जैसे प्यार वाले खेल में होता है।
Speaker
Tulsidas (narrator), reporting King Dasharatha's question in the first line
Listener
General audience
Karuna (with Bhayanaka undertone), in the pathos of the doomed, trusting king
The scene
The prasanga
In the Kopabhavan (anger chamber) scene, Dasharatha asks the queen why she is angry and touches her tenderly. Kaikeyi pushes his hand away and glares like a she-serpent, while the poet warns that her two boons are poised to strike and the king, blinded by destiny, thinks it is only love-play.
The teaching
- Themes
- कैकेयी का कोप और छल, काम से अंधा राजा, भवितव्यता की प्रबलता, सर्पिणी का उपमान, दो वरदानों का विष, प्रेम का भ्रम और सत्य
For right living (Ramrajya ethics)
A ruler who lets desire (kama) rule his judgment cannot see danger in his own household, and Ramrajya demands that the king's affection be governed by discernment and not by passion. The verse also shows how a spouse's anger, nursed with an ulterior purpose, can poison the whole kingdom.
Nirguna and saguna
The unseen ordaining power, working as bhavitavyata, is the formless face of the divine will. It becomes visible in the manifest drama of Kaikeyi's anger, which prepares for Rama's incarnate lila of exile. The poison of the scene thus serves the Lord's purpose.
The king asks why the queen is angry and tenderly touches her, but she thrusts his hand away and glares at him like a she-serpent. Traditional commentators read her two desires as the two tongues of the serpent and the two boons as its fangs, with her gaze searching for the king's most vital spot. Tulsidas steps in to say that Dasharatha, overpowered by bhavitavyata, treats this deadly signal as a lovers' game. The couplet joins pathos and foreboding: the fatal blow is near, and the victim is smiling. It is a warning on how kama can blind even a righteous king.
Chhand of the Harigitika type, a long line of about 28 matras with a mid-line pause (roughly 16/12) and a closing rhyme in -ई (नेवारई, निहारई, देखई, लेखई). The matra count varies with the way the Awadhi syllables are recited.
Utpreksha (poetic fancy), in 'मानहुँ सरोष भुअंग भामिनि ... निहारई', where the queen is imagined as an angry she-serpent. Rupaka (metaphor), in 'दोउ बासना रसना, दसन बर', where the two desires are the serpent's two tongues and the boons its fangs. Anuprasa (alliteration), in the repeated sounds of 'रानि रिसानि', 'परसत पानि पतिहि' and 'भाँति निहारई'. Dramatic irony (Vakrokti), in the king taking deadly menace for 'काम कौतुक'.
In the Vishishtadvaita manner, the verse sees events as unfolding within the Lord's governing will, which is named here as bhavatavyata (destiny), not as chance. The soul in the grip of kama and moha (the king's blindness, the queen's rage) misreads the situation, and the verse leaves the reader to see through that veil.
Raga Marwa or Puriya Dhanashri, whose uneasy, twilight gravity suits the sense of impending calamity beneath the outward calm of the scene.
केहि | हेतु | रानि | रिसानि | परसत | पानि | पतिहि | नेवारई |
मानहुँ | सरोष | भुअंग-भामिनि | बिषम | भाँति | निहारई ||
दोउ | बासना | रसना | दसन | बर | मरम | ठाहरु | देखई |
तुलसी | नृपति | भवतब्यता | बस | काम | कौतुक | लेखई ||
- रिसानि
- क्रोधित, गुस्से मेंOrigin: Awadhi
- नेवारई
- हटाती है, दूर करती है, रोकती हैOrigin: Awadhi
- भुअंग
- साँप, सर्पOrigin: Sanskrit
- दसन
- दाँत, यहाँ साँप के विषदंतOrigin: Sanskrit
- भवतब्यता
- होनहार, नियति, जो अवश्य होना हैOrigin: Sanskrit
- How does the use of Sanskritized Awadhi here elevate the 'Loka' (folk) to the 'Shastra' (scriptural)?
- The domestic quarrel is told in homely Awadhi words such as 'रिसानि', 'पानि' and 'नेवारई', which every listener knows from the household. Alongside them stand Sanskrit-rooted terms such as 'सरोष', 'भुअंग', 'भामिनि', 'बासना', 'मरम' and 'भवतब्यता', which lift the scene into the register of Shastra. This raises a bedroom dispute into a statement about destiny and the working of desire. The folk reader sees a wife's temper, while the learned reader sees kama and bhavitavyata at work.
- What is the specific 'Siddhanta' (doctrine) Tulsidas establishes regarding the Name (Nama) vs Form (Rupa)?
- This verse does not state the Nama-Rupa doctrine directly, and the Name of Rama does not appear in it. It does show, however, how a visible form can mislead: Kaikeyi's appearance of anger, and the king's reading of it as 'काम कौतुक', hide the real design. The surface form is judged wrongly because the king sees no further than the form. By contrast the doctrine of the Name asks the devotee to look beneath outward form to its inner reality. The verse is therefore a negative illustration of that discernment.
- How does this verse reflect the poet's 'Kavi-Manas' (the lake of the poet's mind) metaphor?
- The poet speaks in his own voice in 'तुलसी नृपति भवतब्यता बस', stepping out of the story to comment as a seer. This shows the Manas as a lake whose clear depths hold both the visible ripples of the scene and the hidden current of destiny. The serpent image, with its tongues and fangs, is drawn from the poet's inward vision and fitted exactly to Kaikeyi's two boons. The verse thus shows the poet's mind shaping a plot event into a figure that carries moral warning.
FAQs
दशरथ पूछते हैं कि रानी किस कारण रुष्ट हैं और स्नेह से हाथ से उन्हें छूते हैं। कैकेयी उनका हाथ झटककर पति को दूर हटा देती है। वह उन्हें क्रुद्ध नागिन की तरह भयंकर दृष्टि से देखती है।
कवि ने उसकी दोनों इच्छाओं को नागिन की दो जीभें और दोनों वरदानों को उसके सुंदर विषदंत कहा है। कैकेयी मानो मर्मस्थान खोज रही है जहाँ यह डंक सबसे गहरा लगे। यह रूपक आगे आने वाले विनाश की पूर्व सूचना देता है।
तुलसीदास कहते हैं कि राजा भवितव्यता के वश में है, इसलिए वह कैकेयी के घातक रूप को भी काम-क्रीड़ा का कौतुक समझ बैठता है। उसकी कामासक्ति और नियति दोनों ने उसकी विवेक-दृष्टि को ढक दिया है। इससे पाठक को विषय-आसक्ति से सावधान रहने की सीख मिलती है।
Ask anything about this verse
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Ramcharitmanas in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with word-by-word meanings, Awadhi recitation where available, and more.
